geronimo-dev mailing list archives

Site index · List index
Message view « Date » · « Thread »
Top « Date » · « Thread »
From "Alan D. Cabrera" <l...@toolazydogs.com>
Subject Re: xmlbeans versions -- please respond
Date Wed, 13 Jul 2005 00:11:49 GMT
David Jencks wrote, On 7/12/2005 1:45 PM:

> After struggling with various attempts to use several incompatible 
> versions at once, I have geronimo + openejb working with xmlbeans v2.
>
> I've modified the plugin to install the schemas that are compiled into 
> the artifact jar file under typically META-INF/schema, and these 
> schemas can be extracted by the xmlbeans plugin entity resolver to 
> resolve schema imports.  This dramatically reduces the use of a 
> catalog and makes it possible to remove the 
> difficult-to-keep-synchronized copies of geronimo schemas that are in 
> openejb-builder/src/schema.
>
> I've run a lot of the tck and get the same results with v2 as v1.
>
> I'd like to commit this, well, now to at least the HEAD of geronimo 
> and openejb.  Any objections?  I would like to do this very soon, such 
> as this evening.
>
> As part of the snapshot cleanup for m4 we should stop using the 
> 1.0-DEV version and upgrade to something that's been released.  
> Choices are 1.0.4 and 2.0.0.  I'd prefer 2, and would be more 
> enthusiastic about looking for problems with that upgrade, but don't 
> insist.
>
> I will note that having different version of xmlbeans on two versions 
> of geronimo is incredibly inconvenient, since a complete rebuild is 
> needed when switching from one to the other.  It may be that having 
> different versions (M4 vs SNAPSHOT) will make this problem go away, 
> but I haven't tested this theory.
>
> Opinions on moving M4 to xmlbeans2?
>
> I've opened GERONIMO-738 to track this and to let people look at the 
> patches to evaluate especially applying to M4.


+1 HEAD
-1 M4 (veto, not a vote)


Regards,
Alan




Mime
View raw message