geronimo-dev mailing list archives

Site index · List index
Message view « Date » · « Thread »
Top « Date » · « Thread »
From "Alan D. Cabrera" <l...@toolazydogs.com>
Subject Re: M4 Release Issue - GBeanName Veto
Date Mon, 11 Jul 2005 21:12:02 GMT
I've reconsidered this:

+1 on canonical name as internal string representation
+1 on attempting to preserve whatever string is used to construct  the 
gbean name
+1 on restricting characters in gbean name and assuring that gbean  name 
 >> object name conversion always works in a non-surprising  manner.

How hard would it be to get the GBeanName to do this?


Regards,
Alan


Dain Sundstrom wrote, On 7/11/2005 10:49 AM:

> Before we release M4 we need to resolve the standing veto against  
> geronimo/trunk/modules/kernel/src/java/org/apache/geronimo/gbean/ 
> GBeanName.java
>
> Note the +1s below are actually -1s the removal of said feature from  
> javax.management.ObjectName, which this class replaced.
>
> -dain
>
> Begin forwarded message:
>
>> From: "Alan D. Cabrera" <adc@toolazydogs.com>
>> Date: February 23, 2005 11:56:20 AM PST
>> To: dev@geronimo.apache.org
>> Subject: Re: GBeanName [was: svn commit: r154723...]
>> Reply-To: dev@geronimo.apache.org
>>
>>
>> +1
>>
>> Dain Sundstrom wrote:
>>
>>
>>> For the record;
>>>
>>> +1 on canonical name as internal string representation
>>> -1 on attempting to preserve whatever string is used to construct  
>>> the gbean name
>>> +1 on restricting characters in gbean name and assuring that gbean  
>>> name >> object name conversion always works in a non-surprising  
>>> manner.
>>>
>>
>>



Mime
View raw message