geronimo-dev mailing list archives

Site index · List index
Message view « Date » · « Thread »
Top « Date » · « Thread »
From Gianny Damour <gianny.dam...@optusnet.com.au>
Subject Re: [CONSENSUS?] Preparation for M4 -- branch early
Date Wed, 06 Jul 2005 00:03:56 GMT
On 6/07/2005 6:23 AM, Aaron Mulder wrote:

>On Tue, 5 Jul 2005, Jeremy Boynes wrote:
>  
>
>>I didn't -1 it, I said it wasn't a pre-req, as in I think we can release 
>>M4 without it.
>>
>>As for a technical reason, where's the code? Last I saw was a patch for 
>>TranQL that caused a circular dependency and screwed up the IP. If there 
>>is something newer that addresses these issues I would be happy to look 
>>at it.
>>    
>>
>
>	But I'm not asking for review of the patch.  I'm asking to be able
>to apply it myself.  (FYI, if by circular dependency you mean at the
>Geronimo depends on TranQL and vice versa level, we agreed in earlier
>discussions to move the builder to Geronimo, and the IP issue has been
>resolved.)
>
>	I'm assuming that committership on Geronimo and OpenEJB
>fundamentally equates to committership on TranQL.  If not, what is the
>process for becoming a committer on TranQL?  (Is there a TranQL
>PMC-equivalent?  Or do you personally make the call?)
>  
>
Aaron,

Could you please open a JIRA and attach your patch? There is some lack 
of visibility of your work and I think that the very first step is to 
give an opportunity to everyone to look at your code. I assume that you 
will gain commit access very shortly after.

Thanks,
Gianny

>Thanks,
>	Aaron
>
>  
>


Mime
View raw message