geronimo-dev mailing list archives

Site index · List index
Message view « Date » · « Thread »
Top « Date » · « Thread »
From Jeremy Boynes <>
Subject Re: [CONSENSUS?] Preparation for M4 -- branch early
Date Tue, 05 Jul 2005 22:33:35 GMT
Aaron Mulder wrote:
> On Tue, 5 Jul 2005, Jeremy Boynes wrote:
>>I didn't -1 it, I said it wasn't a pre-req, as in I think we can release 
>>M4 without it.
>>As for a technical reason, where's the code? Last I saw was a patch for 
>>TranQL that caused a circular dependency and screwed up the IP. If there 
>>is something newer that addresses these issues I would be happy to look 
>>at it.
> 	But I'm not asking for review of the patch.  I'm asking to be able
> to apply it myself.  (FYI, if by circular dependency you mean at the
> Geronimo depends on TranQL and vice versa level, we agreed in earlier
> discussions to move the builder to Geronimo, and the IP issue has been
> resolved.)
> 	I'm assuming that committership on Geronimo and OpenEJB
> fundamentally equates to committership on TranQL.  If not, what is the
> process for becoming a committer on TranQL?  (Is there a TranQL
> PMC-equivalent?  Or do you personally make the call?)

TranQL is a Codehaus project so it is down to the despots, currently me. 
The barrier to entry is not high but so far I've not seen anything 
except that problematic patch.


View raw message