geronimo-dev mailing list archives

Site index · List index
Message view « Date » · « Thread »
Top « Date » · « Thread »
From Jeremy Boynes <jboy...@apache.org>
Subject Re: [CONSENSUS?] Preparation for M4 -- branch early
Date Tue, 05 Jul 2005 22:33:35 GMT
Aaron Mulder wrote:
> On Tue, 5 Jul 2005, Jeremy Boynes wrote:
> 
>>I didn't -1 it, I said it wasn't a pre-req, as in I think we can release 
>>M4 without it.
>>
>>As for a technical reason, where's the code? Last I saw was a patch for 
>>TranQL that caused a circular dependency and screwed up the IP. If there 
>>is something newer that addresses these issues I would be happy to look 
>>at it.
> 
> 
> 	But I'm not asking for review of the patch.  I'm asking to be able
> to apply it myself.  (FYI, if by circular dependency you mean at the
> Geronimo depends on TranQL and vice versa level, we agreed in earlier
> discussions to move the builder to Geronimo, and the IP issue has been
> resolved.)
> 
> 	I'm assuming that committership on Geronimo and OpenEJB
> fundamentally equates to committership on TranQL.  If not, what is the
> process for becoming a committer on TranQL?  (Is there a TranQL
> PMC-equivalent?  Or do you personally make the call?)
> 

TranQL is a Codehaus project so it is down to the despots, currently me. 
The barrier to entry is not high but so far I've not seen anything 
except that problematic patch.

--
Jeremy

Mime
View raw message