geronimo-dev mailing list archives

Site index · List index
Message view « Date » · « Thread »
Top « Date » · « Thread »
From Jeff Genender <jgenen...@savoirtech.com>
Subject Re: New Startup Output
Date Tue, 05 Jul 2005 03:57:55 GMT
Absolutely outstanding...

Nice work...its polished.

Jeff

Aaron Mulder wrote:
> 	I just put in a change with nicer startup console output.  It
> gives some progress and status information during the server start process
> and lists the apps deployed and ports used at the end of the startup.  
> Since it uses \r characters to make it work, the output looks lousy if you
> view it in a log file, so there's a -noprogress argument you can add to
> the server command line to suppress it (which the Maven deploy tool does, 
> for example).
> 
> 	In any case, I'd appreciate any thoughts or feedback on the new 
> look.
> 
>  * Jeremy's already suggested adding a middle ground between -noprogress
>    and what's in there, where it would print more or less the same
>    information but one message per line so it looks nicer in a log.  
>    There's just an interface to implement to get the startup sequence
>    calls, so it should be easy enough to support that.
> 
>  * David J recommended the current combination of a short progress bar and
>    status messages instead of my initial attempt, which just had a long
>    (but not very fine-grained) progress bar.  I like the way it came out.
> 
> 	Now that I've done this, I think we can use the same technique to
> hide the password on the deployer command line.
> 
> Thanks,
> 	Aaron
> 
> Log message
> -----------
> New server startup output
>  - shows a progress bar, timer, and operation status during start
>  - shows a list of started application modules (other than o/a/g/System*)
>  - shows a list of network ports that GBeans tried to bind to
> The port list is voluntary on behalf of the GBeans.  They must declare an
>   attribute of type java.net.InetSocketAddress in order to be included
>   in the list (though it can be a read-only attribute).  We should review
>   the current GBeans and make sure they do.
> There is also some logic around calculating the name of a service.  For
>   example, if the same GBean has more than one InetSocketAddress attribute,
>   it tries to add the name of each attribute in the port list, and if the
>   GBean has a "name" attribute (for GBeans tht may be deployed more than
>   once with different names) it includes that too.
> The new progress bar does not render particularly well in log files, and
>   can be disabled by passing -noprogress on the server command line.  The
>   maven deployment plugin does that.

Mime
View raw message