geronimo-dev mailing list archives

Site index · List index
Message view « Date » · « Thread »
Top « Date » · « Thread »
From Donald Woods <drw_...@yahoo.com>
Subject Re: Web Console Status
Date Thu, 21 Jul 2005 20:14:48 GMT
Does this process still apply for Pluto 1.0.1-rc3?
It looks like they are now producing 3 JAR files.

If we are spending time integrating the web console
into the sandbox, shouldn't we at least be using the
latest Pluto version and use their file names as
provided?


-Donald

--- Dave Colasurdo <davecola@earthlink.net> wrote:

> The JIRA entry for the console (GERONIMO-762) has
> been updated with the 
> instructions for creating pluto-portal.jar (actually
> the JIRA contains 
> the jar as well).
> 
> Is the required fix as simple as:
> 1) Rename pluto-portal-1.0.1-rc2.jar to
> geronimo-pluto-portal.jar
> 2) Publish the new jar to the Apache maven
> repository
> 3) Change the console dependency references to use
> the new name
> 
> 
> Any issues with this approach?
> 
> Are special privileges required to publish to the
> Apache maven 
> repository (http://cvs.apache.org/repository/)?
> 
> Thanks
> -Dave-
> 
> 
> Aaron Mulder wrote:
> > 	So it seems that the Pluto problem is pretty
> serious.  We're 
> > actually dependent on an artifact that Pluto does
> not produce.  There is 
> > no "pluto-portal" output from the Pluto build.  I
> think that means we 
> > shouldn't be calling it "pluto-portal", but
> instead 
> > "geronimo-package-of-pluto-portal-code" or
> something along those lines 
> > (but perhaps shorter).
> > 
> > 	No wonder the Pluto fellow is not putting it in
> Maven!  :)
> > 
> > Aaron
> > 
> > 
> 


__________________________________________________
Do You Yahoo!?
Tired of spam?  Yahoo! Mail has the best spam protection around 
http://mail.yahoo.com 

Mime
View raw message