geronimo-dev mailing list archives

Site index · List index
Message view « Date » · « Thread »
Top « Date » · « Thread »
From David Blevins <david.blev...@visi.com>
Subject Re: M4 Release Issue - GBeanName Veto
Date Mon, 11 Jul 2005 23:18:40 GMT
On Mon, Jul 11, 2005 at 06:38:39PM -0400, Geir Magnusson Jr. wrote:
> 
> On Jul 11, 2005, at 4:45 PM, David Blevins wrote:
> 
> >On Mon, Jul 11, 2005 at 09:43:46PM +0200, Jacek Laskowski wrote:
> >
> >>Dain Sundstrom wrote:
> >>
> >>>Before we release M4 we need to resolve the standing veto against
> >>>geronimo/trunk/modules/kernel/src/java/org/apache/geronimo/gbean/
> >>>GBeanName.java
> >>>
> >>>Note the +1s below are actually -1s the removal of said feature from
> >>>javax.management.ObjectName, which this class replaced.
> >>>
> >>
> >>Well, I don't see 0 as the 'I don't know/care' option, which I'm not
> >>very happy with. I seem to be unconscious of what the change would
> >>result in. Would you provide more information to let me vote for or
> >>against it *or* provide the 0 option.
> >>
> >
> >You can always vote anywhere in the range of +1 through -1,  
> >including fractionally like +0.9 or -0.5.
> 
> I think fractions are confusing and I've never really seen them used  
> often.  I tend to think conventional patterns like the following are  
> clearer :
> 
> +1 : yes
> +0 : yes, but I'm not helping
>  0 : no opinion
> -0 : no, but I'm not going to stand in the way
> -1 : no
> 

I agree.  Was just pointing out to Jacek that he can vote 0 if he
wants too -- it's always an option even if not listed.

-David

Mime
View raw message