geronimo-dev mailing list archives

Site index · List index
Message view « Date » · « Thread »
Top « Date » · « Thread »
From Davanum Srinivas <dava...@gmail.com>
Subject Re: Attacking M4
Date Tue, 26 Jul 2005 01:47:05 GMT
sisson,

On 7/25/05, sissonj@insession.com <sissonj@insession.com> wrote:
> Davanum Srinivas <davanum@gmail.com> wrote on 26/07/2005 09:22:34 AM:
> 
> > Javamail & Axis...
> >
> > - Am done with changes to JavaMail. tests are working as well.
> 
> Dims, are you going to build a new release candidate of the javamail spec
> jar - GERONIMO-802 and update the M4 branch to point to it?

Could someone who has done it before do it please? I have no clue
about the steps involved.

> Currently both M4 and HEAD are using
> geronimo_spec_javamail_version=1.3.1-rc4 which was built before some of
> you JavaMail spec changes.
> 
> > - We most probably can't squeeze in a new release of Axis this week.
> > What do we do? (dated snapshot?)
> 
> Dated build sounds good to me.  I don't think it should have SNAPSHOT as
> part of its version or name, as that would cause maven unnecessarily check
> for updates for it.

Sounds good. Let me review the Axis bugs list and come up a dated
build in the next few days.

> Thanks,
> 
> John
> >
> > thanks,
> > -- dims
> >
> > On 7/25/05, David Blevins <david.blevins@visi.com> wrote:
> > > Alright, here is the deal on M4.  We have OSCON coming up and from my
> > > experience, if we don't get M4 out the door this week, then we won't
> > > see it till the week after OSCON.  I actually tried to cut M3 at
> > > OSCON last year and we all know how that went.
> > >
> > > If we don't get M4 out the door this week, our hopes of having M5 by
> > > the 15th are lost.  Assuming we don't want this to happen, here is my
> > > attack plan:
> > >
> > > =ATTACK PLAN==========
> > >
> > > LAST ISSUES
> > >
> > >    - Undeployment issue (GERONIMO-812, David Jencks)
> > >    - Snapshots (Javamail & Axis=>Dims, jUDDI & Scout=>Geir,
> > > ServiceMix=>Hiram, tmpOrb=>Dain)
> > >    - Web Services startup issue (GERONIMO-785, David Blevins)
> > >    - Corba interop problem (GERONIMO-813, Dain Sundstrom)
> > >    - Izpack/Tomcat issue (GERONIMO-811, Unassigned)
> > >    - Unknown CTS issues (need to clear up GERONIMO-812 to run it
> > > completely)
> > >
> > > No sitting on tasks, if you are not going to do it, mark it
> unassigned.
> > >
> > > Issue GERONIMO-811 is unassigned.  Can someone either remove the
> > > Tomcat option from the IzPack installer or add a the link to the wiki?
> > >
> > > It seems GERONIMO-809 is actually completed, is that right?
> > >
> > > THE FINAL STUFF
> > >
> > > We have to run the TCK on the final binary, which means we need to
> > > allow for a couple days of just testing the actual geronimo-1.0-
> > > M4.zip that people will download.  To even get that far, we need to:
> > >
> > >    1. [notes] Create release notes for M4 and check them into the QA
> > > branch
> > >    2. [svn] Close the QA branch and copy it to tags/v1_0_M4
> > >    3. [dist] Cut and sign the binary and source distributions
> > >
> > > We are going to need to be done with the remaining JIRA items above
> > > by like Wednesday (best) or Thursday morning in order to do the above
> > > tasks.
> > >
> > > I am willing to take care of the svn and dist work. Side-note: I have
> > > to go to a wedding on Friday, so I personally would like to shoot for
> > > Wednesday as Thursday night is too late for me.
> > >
> > > Aaron, you willing to do the nice release notes like you did for M3?
> > >
> > > ====================
> > >
> > > Sound good to everyone?  Going to assume a lazy consensus otherwise.
> > >
> > > -David
> > >
> > >
> >
> >
> > --
> > Davanum Srinivas -http://blogs.cocoondev.org/dims/
> 
> 


-- 
Davanum Srinivas -http://blogs.cocoondev.org/dims/

Mime
View raw message