geronimo-dev mailing list archives

Site index · List index
Message view « Date » · « Thread »
Top « Date » · « Thread »
From "Sachin Patel (JIRA)" <>
Subject [jira] Created: (GERONIMO-825) schemaLocation attribute values in deployment plans contain problematic "schema\" prefix.
Date Wed, 27 Jul 2005 21:12:18 GMT
schemaLocation attribute values in deployment plans contain problematic "schema\" prefix.

         Key: GERONIMO-825
     Project: Geronimo
        Type: Bug
    Versions: 1.0-M4    
    Reporter: Sachin Patel
    Priority: Minor

>From IRC conversation...

[16:33] sppatel: I'm looking at the deployment plan schemas, and noticed something odd.  Could
someone explain 
why the path "/schema" is being included in some the schemaLocations in several of the xsd
where other schemas are being imported.  This looks like an error to me. 

For example.... geronimo-web.xsd imports  

<xs:import namespace="" schemaLocation="schema/geronimo-security.xsd"/>

whereas geronimo-application.xsd references the same schema but its schemaLocation="geronimo-security.xsd"

Why is the "schema/" prefix being included?
[16:45] djencks: sppatel: I think one of those is an error, but I'm not sure which
[16:46] djencks: it's using an entity resolver in the xmlbeans2 maven plugin that looks in
the classpath jars for the xsd file
[16:46] sppatel: djencks: I'm attempting to generate EMF models for the deployment plans,
and was forced to remove the prefix /schema in all scheamaLocations for it to correctly resolve
[16:46] djencks: what is emf?
[16:46] djencks: don't think is is electromotive force :-)
[16:47] sppatel: Eclipse Modeling Framework....:)
[16:47] sppatel:  I'm working on providing deployment plan editors for the Geronimo Server
[16:47] djencks: cool
[16:47] djencks: where are you getting the schemas from?
[16:48] sppatel: from the schema folder in a install image
[16:48] sppatel: since their bundled all togather, the "schema/ prefx doesn't make sense
[16:48] djencks: can you read them out of a classpath using a classloader?
[16:49] djencks: not critical, just asking
[16:49] sppatel: not sure how to do that
[16:49] djencks: it would be a useful capability I think for the EMF
[16:50] djencks: well, there are at least 2 solutions I can think of:
[16:50] djencks: 1. figure out a way so xmlbeans doesn't need the prefix... this may be actually
more in line with what xmlbeans wants to do anyway
[16:51] djencks: 2. modify the copies of the schemas to remove the /schema  prefix
[16:51] djencks: can you file a JIRA issue?
[16:51] sppatel: sure, np.  2 is fine with me for now... just wanted to bring it up
[16:52] *** sbailliez has joined #geronimo.
[16:52] djencks: Is this blocking your progress? Can you remove the prefix by hand until we
figure out what to do? I would prefer (1) if it works
[16:53] sppatel: no its not blocking, i'm changing the refs by hand. yeah 1 would be ideal,
especially if the scheams are going to be changing in the future
[16:54] djencks: well, we are hoping that we will have stabilized them by 1.0 to a n, n-2
support model :-)

This message is automatically generated by JIRA.
If you think it was sent incorrectly contact one of the administrators:
For more information on JIRA, see:

View raw message