geronimo-dev mailing list archives

Site index · List index
Message view « Date » · « Thread »
Top « Date » · « Thread »
From "John Sisson (JIRA)" <...@geronimo.apache.org>
Subject [jira] Updated: (GERONIMO-744) Review specs and move them from rc versions to formal versions
Date Thu, 14 Jul 2005 02:38:12 GMT
     [ http://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/GERONIMO-744?page=all ]

John Sisson updated GERONIMO-744:
---------------------------------

      Component: dependencies
        Summary: Review specs and move them from rc versions to formal versions  (was: Change
spec dependencies to formal versions)
    Fix Version: 1.0-M5
                     (was: 1.0-M4)
    Description: 
Currently Geronimo is depending upon release candidate and snapshot versions of the specs
JARs.

See mail dev list mail thread for Jeremy's proposal "Release specs as a separate distro from
M4":

http://marc.theaimsgroup.com/?t=112084085400004&r=1&w=2

Dain suggested "Before we make the final spec releases, maybe we should all pick one  or two
spec modules to review for obvious issues. I'll take qname since it only has one class ;)"

Maybe we should create and assign a JIRA subtasks for the review of each spec, so this work
can be tracked.

I have created separate issues for specs that need to be moved from SNAPSHOTS for the M4 release
and I will leave this issue to deal with the review of the specs and moving them from release
candidate to formal releases.  Shall we aim for the formal releases in M5?

  was:
Currently Geronimo is depending upon release candidate and snapshot versions of the specs
JARs.

See mail dev list mail thread for Jeremy's proposal "Release specs as a separate distro from
M4":

http://marc.theaimsgroup.com/?t=112084085400004&r=1&w=2

Dain suggested "Before we make the final spec releases, maybe we should all pick one  or two
spec modules to review for obvious issues. I'll take qname since it only has one class ;)"

Maybe we should create and assign a JIRA subtasks for the review of each spec, so this work
can be tracked.


> Review specs and move them from rc versions to formal versions
> --------------------------------------------------------------
>
>          Key: GERONIMO-744
>          URL: http://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/GERONIMO-744
>      Project: Geronimo
>         Type: Task
>   Components: specs, dependencies
>     Versions: 1.0-M4
>     Reporter: John Sisson
>      Fix For: 1.0-M5

>
> Currently Geronimo is depending upon release candidate and snapshot versions of the specs
JARs.
> See mail dev list mail thread for Jeremy's proposal "Release specs as a separate distro
from M4":
> http://marc.theaimsgroup.com/?t=112084085400004&r=1&w=2
> Dain suggested "Before we make the final spec releases, maybe we should all pick one
 or two spec modules to review for obvious issues. I'll take qname since it only has one class
;)"
> Maybe we should create and assign a JIRA subtasks for the review of each spec, so this
work can be tracked.
> I have created separate issues for specs that need to be moved from SNAPSHOTS for the
M4 release and I will leave this issue to deal with the review of the specs and moving them
from release candidate to formal releases.  Shall we aim for the formal releases in M5?

-- 
This message is automatically generated by JIRA.
-
If you think it was sent incorrectly contact one of the administrators:
   http://issues.apache.org/jira/secure/Administrators.jspa
-
For more information on JIRA, see:
   http://www.atlassian.com/software/jira


Mime
View raw message