geronimo-dev mailing list archives

Site index · List index
Message view « Date » · « Thread »
Top « Date » · « Thread »
From "Matt Hogstrom" <m...@hogstrom.org>
Subject Re: Wait or not? Respond quick. (M4 -- 24 hour notice of branch)
Date Sat, 09 Jul 2005 00:54:15 GMT
Cut and run...+1

- Matt
----- Original Message ----- 
From: "Geir Magnusson Jr." <geirm@apache.org>
To: <dev@geronimo.apache.org>
Sent: Friday, July 08, 2005 8:17 PM
Subject: Re: Wait or not? Respond quick. (M4 -- 24 hour notice of branch)


> so the consensus so far is that people just want the branch to be
> cut... I have no problem with that if people don't want to do any of
> these for M4...
>
> geir
>
> On Jul 8, 2005, at 5:57 PM, Geir Magnusson Jr. wrote:
>
> >
> > On Jul 8, 2005, at 5:47 PM, David Blevins wrote:
> >
> >
> >> On Thu, Jul 07, 2005 at 11:23:52PM -0700, David Blevins wrote:
> >>
> >>
> >>> We can consider as a group if we want to hold up the branch for
> >>> these
> >>> improvements [....]
> >>>
> >>>
> >>
> >>
> >>
> >>> Thoughs from the group?
> >>>
> >>>
> >>
> >> So you guys want to wait or not?  Not going to make this call by
> >> myself.
> >>
> >
> > I was just working on a note for this so I'll just do it here - I
> > think driving to an M4 is a good thing, but we should agree on what
> > additional stuff we're going to do and do it and then branch, or
> > decide we're going to go with where we are, branch for M4 get the
> > M4 out, and then try and rev an M5 quickly soon after with the
> > stuff that we decided not to put in M4.
> >
> > Of the things I've seen and sound good and easy and good corners to
> > knock off or get started to get people to contribute :
> >
> >  - have startup/shutdown/deploy scripts
> >  - fix the deployer to not echo your password
> >  - fix the deployer to not be totally silent
> >  - get a release of ActiveMQ more recent than this afternoon (so
> > our port
> >    list will show the ActiveMQ port)
> >  - have a sample web app set as the default so localhost:8080
> > doesn't 404
> >
> > Things that sound good but I don't grok completely :
> >
> >  - give the deployer a custom message for the case where
> > RuntimeDeployer
> >    is not deployed
> >  - see if we can eliminate class names from PK Generator configuration
> >  - add a shutdown JAR, or management JAR with shutdown implemented
> >
> > Things that sound good but might be hard and take long and
> > therefore be good for M5 :
> >
> >  - make sure exceptions propogate to the deploy tool well
> >  - provide a bundled or linked MC4J release
> >  - Matt's fix for the CMP/CMR issue
> >
> > My $0.02
> >
> > I'll also summarize our recent "Roadmap" thread and we can look at
> > that for M5, Mx ... v1.0
> >
> > geir
> >
> > -- 
> > Geir Magnusson Jr                                  +1-203-665-6437
> > geirm@apache.org
> >
> >
> >
>
> -- 
> Geir Magnusson Jr                                  +1-203-665-6437
> geirm@apache.org
>
>
>
>



Mime
View raw message