Return-Path: Delivered-To: apmail-geronimo-dev-archive@www.apache.org Received: (qmail 11193 invoked from network); 6 Jun 2005 12:41:09 -0000 Received: from hermes.apache.org (HELO mail.apache.org) (209.237.227.199) by minotaur.apache.org with SMTP; 6 Jun 2005 12:41:09 -0000 Received: (qmail 44198 invoked by uid 500); 6 Jun 2005 12:41:03 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-geronimo-dev-archive@geronimo.apache.org Received: (qmail 44168 invoked by uid 500); 6 Jun 2005 12:41:03 -0000 Mailing-List: contact dev-help@geronimo.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk list-help: list-unsubscribe: List-Post: Reply-To: dev@geronimo.apache.org List-Id: Delivered-To: mailing list dev@geronimo.apache.org Received: (qmail 44135 invoked by uid 99); 6 Jun 2005 12:41:02 -0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=0.0 required=10.0 tests= X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received-SPF: neutral (hermes.apache.org: local policy) Received: from bbnrelbul01.net.external.hp.com (HELO bbnrelbul01.net.external.hp.com) (155.208.255.20) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.28) with ESMTP; Mon, 06 Jun 2005 05:41:00 -0700 Received: from vistula.poland.hp.com (vistula.poland.hp.com [15.188.0.12]) by bbnrelbul01.net.external.hp.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 4009837D86 for ; Mon, 6 Jun 2005 14:13:21 +0200 (CEST) Received: from [127.0.0.1] (jlaskowski1.emea.hpqcorp.net [16.55.101.31]) by vistula.poland.hp.com with ESMTP (8.9.3 (PHNE_28760_binary)/8.8.6 SMKit7.02) id OAA01875 for ; Mon, 6 Jun 2005 14:13:14 +0200 (METDST) Message-ID: <42A43DD8.4070005@apache.org> Date: Mon, 06 Jun 2005 14:13:12 +0200 From: Jacek Laskowski Organization: Apache Geronimo (http://geronimo.apache.org) User-Agent: Mozilla Thunderbird 1.0.2 (Windows/20050317) X-Accept-Language: en-us, en MIME-Version: 1.0 To: dev@geronimo.apache.org Subject: Re: How complete is JSR-88 support? References: In-Reply-To: Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Virus-Checked: Checked X-Spam-Rating: minotaur.apache.org 1.6.2 0/1000/N Peter Nabbefeld wrote: > > Hello, > > from the wiki, it seems nothing has changed since 2005-03-22 05:39:00 > (obviously the roadmap hasn't been updated since then) ;-) . > > So just my question: Is JSR-88 support complete? And what about the > others? From the dev mailing list, I'd guess Geronimo is almost > complete, so what (other than certification) is incomplete yet? Hi Peter, Well, I'm just investigating the current status of Geronimo JSR88 support as I'm developing a NetBeans serverplugins module. NetBeans IDE already comes with several app servers and I decided to add Geronimo as well. I couldn't long settle on which Rich Client Platform to pick up to develop the module and after some rather general evaluation I decided to go with NetBeans RCP. I must admit I very liked the announcement that Eclipse has its own Geronimo plugin, too. As far as I understand Geronimo JSR88 support, there're some parts of JSR88 which aren't yet available. Most of the operations throws Unsupported operation or something alike. I'm going to start a thread about how much impact it might have on the current certification work so I'm happy I'm not alone who's interested in it :) As far as the NetBeans module (NBM) is concerned, it's not yet announced here (and actually anywhere else but NetBeans nbj2ee mailing list) as I don't actually know when it is going to be finished. At the moment, the module adds a Geronimo instance (downloaded or built from sources), once started up (it's mocked up at the moment to make sure I'm not distracted with Geronimo itself) it prints out available configurations, sets up one as default to be started up the next time. The last piece of the puzzle is to have modules deployed using DeploymentManager. I'm not yet using Geronimo's JMXDeploymentManager due to some class libraries constraints on my part. That's why I can't say exactly what's missing. Well, it's great you've asked about it - I should've written about it long ago, esp. having noticed Eclipse WDT support for Geronimo. It looks there're two IDEs which are heading towards the same goal, so sooner or later Geronimo DeploymentManager will surely be complete. Stay tuned. > Peter Nabbefeld Jacek