Return-Path: Delivered-To: apmail-geronimo-dev-archive@www.apache.org Received: (qmail 55666 invoked from network); 31 May 2005 16:31:52 -0000 Received: from hermes.apache.org (HELO mail.apache.org) (209.237.227.199) by minotaur.apache.org with SMTP; 31 May 2005 16:31:52 -0000 Received: (qmail 38291 invoked by uid 500); 31 May 2005 16:31:47 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-geronimo-dev-archive@geronimo.apache.org Received: (qmail 38243 invoked by uid 500); 31 May 2005 16:31:46 -0000 Mailing-List: contact dev-help@geronimo.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk list-help: list-unsubscribe: List-Post: Reply-To: dev@geronimo.apache.org List-Id: Delivered-To: mailing list dev@geronimo.apache.org Received: (qmail 38209 invoked by uid 99); 31 May 2005 16:31:46 -0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=-8.2 required=10.0 tests=ALL_TRUSTED,RCVD_IN_NJABL_DUL,RCVD_IN_SORBS_DUL X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received-SPF: pass (hermes.apache.org: local policy) Received: from ss53.shared.server-system.net (HELO ss53.shared.server-system.net) (72.10.34.2) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.28) with ESMTP; Tue, 31 May 2005 09:31:43 -0700 Received: from [127.0.0.1] (cpe-66-108-84-172.nyc.res.rr.com [66.108.84.172]) (authenticated (0 bits)) by ss53.shared.server-system.net (8.11.6/8.11.6) with ESMTP id j4VGVW229008 for ; Tue, 31 May 2005 09:31:32 -0700 Message-ID: <429C9162.50804@toolazydogs.com> Date: Tue, 31 May 2005 12:31:30 -0400 From: "Alan D. Cabrera" User-Agent: Mozilla Thunderbird 1.0 (Windows/20041206) X-Accept-Language: en-us, en MIME-Version: 1.0 To: dev@geronimo.apache.org Subject: Re: Stable/Unstable/Sandbox References: <02A1A663-0DC1-45AD-BB21-39328834AF6B@apache.org> In-Reply-To: Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Virus-Checked: Checked X-Spam-Rating: minotaur.apache.org 1.6.2 0/1000/N I like the sandbox. It's a place where people can goof off w/ experimental stuff and propose significant changes . I tend to think that all non-sandbox stuff as things that the Geronimo community is commited to supporting. Regards, Alan Aaron Mulder wrote, On 5/31/2005 12:19 PM: > Fine with me, though I'm not sure we really need sandbox -- >unstable is unstable, right? Whatever. > > Are we planning that these locations are for modules, and the >kernel and assembly/assemblies will be maintained outside of this >structure? > >Aaron > >On Tue, 31 May 2005, Geir Magnusson Jr. wrote: > > >>Can we agree that we need to somehow construct the stable, unstable >>and sandbox codebases? >> >>If so, can we move on to how? >> >> >>geir >>-- >>Geir Magnusson Jr +1-203-665-6437 >>geirm@apache.org >> >> >> >> >>