Return-Path: Delivered-To: apmail-geronimo-dev-archive@www.apache.org Received: (qmail 4405 invoked from network); 28 May 2005 00:03:26 -0000 Received: from hermes.apache.org (HELO mail.apache.org) (209.237.227.199) by minotaur.apache.org with SMTP; 28 May 2005 00:03:26 -0000 Received: (qmail 20627 invoked by uid 500); 28 May 2005 00:03:22 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-geronimo-dev-archive@geronimo.apache.org Received: (qmail 20581 invoked by uid 500); 28 May 2005 00:03:22 -0000 Mailing-List: contact dev-help@geronimo.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk list-help: list-unsubscribe: List-Post: Reply-To: dev@geronimo.apache.org List-Id: Delivered-To: mailing list dev@geronimo.apache.org Received: (qmail 20567 invoked by uid 99); 28 May 2005 00:03:22 -0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=-8.1 required=10.0 tests=ALL_TRUSTED,HTML_40_50,HTML_MESSAGE,RCVD_IN_NJABL_DUL,RCVD_IN_SORBS_DUL X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received-SPF: pass (hermes.apache.org: local policy) Received: from ss53.shared.server-system.net (HELO ss53.shared.server-system.net) (72.10.34.2) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.28) with ESMTP; Fri, 27 May 2005 17:03:21 -0700 Received: from [127.0.0.1] (cpe-66-108-84-172.nyc.res.rr.com [66.108.84.172]) (authenticated (0 bits)) by ss53.shared.server-system.net (8.11.6/8.11.6) with ESMTP id j4S03J230666 for ; Fri, 27 May 2005 17:03:19 -0700 Message-ID: <4297B549.6050908@toolazydogs.com> Date: Fri, 27 May 2005 20:03:21 -0400 From: "Alan D. Cabrera" User-Agent: Mozilla Thunderbird 1.0 (Windows/20041206) X-Accept-Language: en-us, en MIME-Version: 1.0 To: dev@geronimo.apache.org Subject: Re: Module restructure References: <429745BC.3090109@apache.org> <6F179C9F-8583-4378-8B44-94E7DC00E157@apache.org> <20050527202501.GC4345@django> <20050527232415.GE4345@django> <4297ACC1.7080501@apache.org> <4297AD78.4020207@toolazydogs.com> <4297AF85.2040500@apache.org> <20050527235149.GF4345@django> In-Reply-To: <20050527235149.GF4345@django> Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="------------070202040402040200050701" X-Virus-Checked: Checked X-Spam-Rating: minotaur.apache.org 1.6.2 0/1000/N This is a multi-part message in MIME format. --------------070202040402040200050701 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit David Blevins wrote, On 5/27/2005 7:51 PM: >On Fri, May 27, 2005 at 04:38:45PM -0700, Jeremy Boynes wrote: > > >>Alan D. Cabrera wrote: >> >> >>>Jeremy Boynes wrote, On 5/27/2005 7:26 PM: >>> >>> >>> >>>>David Blevins wrote: >>>> >>>>This one >>>> >>>> >>>> >>>>>../repos/asf/geronimo/unstable/modules/transaction >>>>>../repos/asf/geronimo/stable/modules/transaction >>>>> >>>>> >>>>> >>>Why would we have two versions of transaction? >>> >>> >>> >>I actually think there are going to be additional ones but was keeping >>it simple to indicate that "stable" came higher up than "transaction". >>Ultimately we might end up with (hypothetically) >> >>.../geronimo/stable/1.0/modules/transaction >>.../geronimo/stable/1.2/modules/transaction >>.../geronimo/stable/2.0/modules/transaction >>.../geronimo/unstable/1.3/modules/transaction >>.../geronimo/unstable/2.1/modules/transaction >> >> >> > >Oh, I get it. You're just proposing to add the linux kernel odd/even spin on what we have now and dump trunk. > > Anyone know the lore as to why they went odd even? Was it the case that the tool that they were using drove them to such an odd nomenclature? Regards, Alan --------------070202040402040200050701 Content-Type: text/html; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit

David Blevins wrote, On 5/27/2005 7:51 PM: 
On Fri, May 27, 2005 at 04:38:45PM -0700, Jeremy Boynes wrote:
  
Alan D. Cabrera wrote:
    
Jeremy Boynes wrote, On 5/27/2005 7:26 PM:

      
David Blevins wrote:

This one

        
../repos/asf/geronimo/unstable/modules/transaction
../repos/asf/geronimo/stable/modules/transaction

          
Why would we have two versions of transaction?

      
I actually think there are going to be additional ones but was keeping 
it simple to indicate that "stable" came higher up than "transaction". 
Ultimately we might end up with (hypothetically)

.../geronimo/stable/1.0/modules/transaction
.../geronimo/stable/1.2/modules/transaction
.../geronimo/stable/2.0/modules/transaction
.../geronimo/unstable/1.3/modules/transaction
.../geronimo/unstable/2.1/modules/transaction

    

Oh, I get it.  You're just proposing to add the linux kernel odd/even spin on what we have now and dump trunk.
Anyone know the lore as to why they went odd even?  Was it the case that the tool that they were using drove them to such an odd nomenclature?


Regards,
Alan





--------------070202040402040200050701--