Return-Path: Delivered-To: apmail-geronimo-dev-archive@www.apache.org Received: (qmail 1906 invoked from network); 20 May 2005 23:21:33 -0000 Received: from hermes.apache.org (HELO mail.apache.org) (209.237.227.199) by minotaur.apache.org with SMTP; 20 May 2005 23:21:33 -0000 Received: (qmail 81945 invoked by uid 500); 20 May 2005 23:21:25 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-geronimo-dev-archive@geronimo.apache.org Received: (qmail 81840 invoked by uid 500); 20 May 2005 23:21:23 -0000 Mailing-List: contact dev-help@geronimo.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk list-help: list-unsubscribe: List-Post: Reply-To: dev@geronimo.apache.org List-Id: Delivered-To: mailing list dev@geronimo.apache.org Received: (qmail 81824 invoked by uid 99); 20 May 2005 23:21:23 -0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=-8.2 required=10.0 tests=ALL_TRUSTED,RCVD_IN_NJABL_DUL,RCVD_IN_SORBS_DUL X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received-SPF: pass (hermes.apache.org: local policy) Received: from ss53.shared.server-system.net (HELO ss53.shared.server-system.net) (72.10.34.2) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.28) with ESMTP; Fri, 20 May 2005 16:21:21 -0700 Received: from [192.168.1.100] (cpe-66-108-84-172.nyc.res.rr.com [66.108.84.172]) (authenticated (0 bits)) by ss53.shared.server-system.net (8.11.6/8.11.6) with ESMTP id j4KNL8F20383 for ; Fri, 20 May 2005 16:21:08 -0700 Message-ID: <428E6F99.7010702@toolazydogs.com> Date: Fri, 20 May 2005 19:15:37 -0400 From: "Alan D. Cabrera" User-Agent: Mozilla Thunderbird 1.0 (Windows/20041206) X-Accept-Language: en-us, en MIME-Version: 1.0 To: dev@geronimo.apache.org Subject: Re: Serialization vs. XML - NOT NOW PLEASE References: <428D6886.10101@apache.org> <4986CE36-A469-4D88-93FD-FF8DB58E6A56@iq80.com> In-Reply-To: Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Virus-Checked: Checked X-Spam-Rating: minotaur.apache.org 1.6.2 0/1000/N On 5/20/2005 3:11 PM, David Jencks wrote (paraphrased): > I'm afraid I agree with Jeremy. I'm finding responding to this > ----very--- time consuming and I see no progress yet on resolving > anything. I'm glad that you chimed in here. I was going to reply that I'm cool with this discussion but, I see that you find this burdensome; now that I think of it, it is tough for me to juggle this as well. If it does proceed, I'm not sure that I, or others that are working on certification, will be able to keep along with the thread; you may need to repeat yourself after we're done. Regards, Alan