Return-Path: Delivered-To: apmail-geronimo-dev-archive@www.apache.org Received: (qmail 9352 invoked from network); 5 May 2005 18:37:39 -0000 Received: from hermes.apache.org (HELO mail.apache.org) (209.237.227.199) by minotaur.apache.org with SMTP; 5 May 2005 18:37:39 -0000 Received: (qmail 29095 invoked by uid 500); 5 May 2005 18:38:52 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-geronimo-dev-archive@geronimo.apache.org Received: (qmail 28989 invoked by uid 500); 5 May 2005 18:38:52 -0000 Mailing-List: contact dev-help@geronimo.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk list-help: list-unsubscribe: List-Post: Reply-To: dev@geronimo.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list dev@geronimo.apache.org Received: (qmail 28926 invoked by uid 99); 5 May 2005 18:38:52 -0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=0.0 required=10.0 tests= X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received-SPF: pass (hermes.apache.org: local policy) Received: from smtp104.mail.sc5.yahoo.com (HELO smtp104.mail.sc5.yahoo.com) (66.163.169.223) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.28) with SMTP; Thu, 05 May 2005 11:38:50 -0700 Received: from unknown (HELO ?192.168.1.5?) (david?jencks@66.93.38.137 with plain) by smtp104.mail.sc5.yahoo.com with SMTP; 5 May 2005 18:36:15 -0000 Mime-Version: 1.0 (Apple Message framework v619.2) In-Reply-To: <925104237.1115315950835.JavaMail.jira@ajax.apache.org> References: <925104237.1115315950835.JavaMail.jira@ajax.apache.org> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII; delsp=yes; format=flowed Message-Id: <2c796c2b2623967bb368c4e6a75e5c63@yahoo.com> Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit From: David Jencks Subject: Re: [jira] Commented: (GERONIMO-317) Support for method-permissions in the web.xml in Tomcat Date: Thu, 5 May 2005 11:36:14 -0700 To: dev@geronimo.apache.org X-Mailer: Apple Mail (2.619.2) X-Virus-Checked: Checked X-Spam-Rating: minotaur.apache.org 1.6.2 0/1000/N FWIW I think what david is asking for here is what you get using the JACC tomcat realm. I don't see method-permissions mentioned. The idea is to use the geronimo permissions-role mapping rather than the "identity" non-mapping supplied by tomcat that IIRC you can still get using the tomcat JAAS realm. david jencks On May 5, 2005, at 10:59 AM, Jeff Genender (JIRA) wrote: > [ > http://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/GERONIMO-317? > page=comments#action_64574 ] > > Jeff Genender commented on GERONIMO-317: > ---------------------------------------- > > David, can you be more specific by method-permissions in the web.xml? > I am assuming you are referring to method permissions of EJB? AFAIK, > web.xml does not have method permissions. Are you referring to the > web-resource and user-data constraints? These are now supported. > >> Support for method-permissions in the web.xml in Tomcat >> ------------------------------------------------------- >> >> Key: GERONIMO-317 >> URL: http://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/GERONIMO-317 >> Project: Geronimo >> Type: Task >> Components: web, Tomcat, security, deployment >> Reporter: David Blevins >> Assignee: Alan Cabrera > >> >> Security roles in the web.xml should be linked to roles defined in a >> Geronimo security realm and not the Tomcat security realm provider. > > -- > This message is automatically generated by JIRA. > - > If you think it was sent incorrectly contact one of the administrators: > http://issues.apache.org/jira/secure/Administrators.jspa > - > For more information on JIRA, see: > http://www.atlassian.com/software/jira >