Return-Path: Delivered-To: apmail-geronimo-dev-archive@www.apache.org Received: (qmail 45159 invoked from network); 17 May 2005 09:57:57 -0000 Received: from hermes.apache.org (HELO mail.apache.org) (209.237.227.199) by minotaur.apache.org with SMTP; 17 May 2005 09:57:57 -0000 Received: (qmail 63685 invoked by uid 500); 16 May 2005 23:00:16 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-geronimo-dev-archive@geronimo.apache.org Received: (qmail 63603 invoked by uid 500); 16 May 2005 23:00:12 -0000 Mailing-List: contact dev-help@geronimo.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk list-help: list-unsubscribe: List-Post: Reply-To: dev@geronimo.apache.org List-Id: Delivered-To: mailing list dev@geronimo.apache.org Received: (qmail 63560 invoked by uid 99); 16 May 2005 23:00:12 -0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=0.2 required=10.0 tests=DATE_IN_PAST_06_12,SPF_HELO_PASS,SPF_PASS X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received-SPF: pass (hermes.apache.org: domain of dblevins@visi.com designates 208.42.156.9 as permitted sender) Received: from cenn.mc.mpls.visi.com (HELO cenn.mc.mpls.visi.com) (208.42.156.9) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.28) with ESMTP; Mon, 16 May 2005 16:00:09 -0700 Received: from isis.visi.com (isis.visi.com [209.98.98.8]) by cenn.mc.mpls.visi.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 1F696822D for ; Mon, 16 May 2005 17:59:27 -0500 (CDT) Received: by isis.visi.com (Postfix, from userid 21236) id D2FB276C6F; Mon, 16 May 2005 17:59:26 -0500 (CDT) Date: Mon, 16 May 2005 08:59:37 -0700 From: David Blevins To: dev@geronimo.apache.org Subject: Re: API and serialization compatibility, was: Build Failure Message-ID: <20050516155937.GD16149@django> References: <530E1479-FF80-4059-8FA5-ABC00E41E382@iq80.com> <42868212.5010904@apache.org> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <42868212.5010904@apache.org> User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.9i X-Virus-Checked: Checked X-Spam-Rating: minotaur.apache.org 1.6.2 0/1000/N On Sat, May 14, 2005 at 03:56:18PM -0700, Jeremy Boynes wrote: > > And after all, one requirement Sun place on a JavaBean is that it is > Serializable. > They do not require that the JavaBean is serializable bewteen versions of the class. That requirement and the problems it introduces are Geronimo's. -David