geronimo-dev mailing list archives

Site index · List index
Message view « Date » · « Thread »
Top « Date » · « Thread »
From "Geir Magnusson Jr." <ge...@apache.org>
Subject Re: Geronimo subprojects?
Date Mon, 30 May 2005 18:34:39 GMT

On May 28, 2005, at 1:41 PM, Jeff Genender wrote:

> I think I wrote something a little confusing...let me clarify...
>
> What we do to a subset of Geronimo has impact on the whether it  
> passes.  However if Geronimo passes the TCK, then a subset would  
> include the features that passed.

Technically speaking, you couldn't make that claim.

> However, as it stands, passing is an all-or-nothing propsition.

Yes.

We do have licenses for stand-alone TCKs for projects that we have.   
I'd be hard-pressed to argue that we should be able to get TCks for  
things we don't have, like JMS.

geir

>
> I hope that was less confuusing.
>
> Jeff Genender wrote:
>
>> Brian K. Wallace wrote:
>>
>>> ~  1. Assuming the whole of Geronimo passes the TCK, what can be  
>>> said of
>>> a 'minimal' Geronimo? Is it able to claim anything with regard to  
>>> the TCK?
>>>
>> TCK is all or nothing.  You pass all tests or you don't pass  
>> certification.  A minimal Geronimo would clearly be a subset of  
>> the "whole tomato", so TCK has no bearing on this, nor should  
>> there be concern.  A minimal Geronimo is just disconnecting the  
>> features you don't want from the configuration.  TCK and minimal  
>> Geronimo are mutually exclusive and do not impact each other in  
>> any way.
>>
>
>

-- 
Geir Magnusson Jr                                  +1-203-665-6437
geirm@apache.org



Mime
View raw message