geronimo-dev mailing list archives

Site index · List index
Message view « Date » · « Thread »
Top « Date » · « Thread »
From "Geir Magnusson Jr." <ge...@apache.org>
Subject Re: Stable/Unstable/Sandbox
Date Wed, 01 Jun 2005 00:54:17 GMT

On May 31, 2005, at 7:40 PM, David Blevins wrote:

> On Tue, May 31, 2005 at 04:21:21PM -0700, David Blevins wrote:
>
>> On Tue, May 31, 2005 at 11:50:43AM -0400, Geir Magnusson Jr. wrote:
>>
>>> Can we agree that we need to somehow construct the stable, unstable
>>> and sandbox codebases?
>>>
>>
>> I don't think we have agreed on what is stable and what is  
>> unstable.  We were having a discussion on the fact that it is now  
>> impossible to offer a stable upgrade/patch path for applications.   
>> That thread was killed with "PLEASE CAN WE PUT IT ON HOLD UNTIL  
>> AFTER CERTIFICATION."
>>
>> Now Jeremy has proposed that we ignore that discussion and begin  
>> cementing what we currently have as stable.  How is that at all fair?
>>
>>
>
>
> Just going to throw out that I think the only goal we can all agree  
> on is to not regress on certification once we achieve it.

I think that's a requirement, certainly in the "stable" tree :)


geir

>
> -David
>
>

-- 
Geir Magnusson Jr                                  +1-203-665-6437
geirm@apache.org



Mime
View raw message