geronimo-dev mailing list archives

Site index · List index
Message view « Date » · « Thread »
Top « Date » · « Thread »
From Bruce Snyder <bruce.sny...@gmail.com>
Subject Re: Stable/Unstable/Sandbox
Date Wed, 01 Jun 2005 00:51:19 GMT
On 5/31/05, David Jencks <david_jencks@yahoo.com> wrote:

> >> I don't think we have agreed on what is stable and what is unstable.
> >> We were having a discussion on the fact that it is now impossible to
> >> offer a stable upgrade/patch path for applications.  That thread was
> >> killed with "PLEASE CAN WE PUT IT ON HOLD UNTIL AFTER CERTIFICATION."
> >>
> >> Now Jeremy has proposed that we ignore that discussion and begin
> >> cementing what we currently have as stable.  How is that at all fair?
> >>
> 
> I don't know about fair, but I am finding this discussion nearly as
> distracting as the previous one that we put on hold.  I still don't see
> what exotic svn tricks might buy us over normal svn usage, and don't
> want to spend a lot of time thinking about it until we pass all the
> tests.  I still think everyones perspective may change once we are
> passing all the tests and have fixed the few egregious architectural
> problems that crept in.

If you're referring to the circular dependency between Geronimo and
OpenEJB, I agree. This needs to be fixed ASAP.

Bruce 
-- 
perl -e 'print unpack("u30","D0G)U8V4\@4VYY9&5R\"F)R=6-E+G-N>61E<D\!G;6%I;\"YC;VT*"
);'

The Castor Project
http://www.castor.org/

Apache Geronimo
http://geronimo.apache.org/

Mime
View raw message