geronimo-dev mailing list archives

Site index · List index
Message view « Date » · « Thread »
Top « Date » · « Thread »
From Bruce Snyder <>
Subject Re: Module restructure
Date Fri, 27 May 2005 18:44:03 GMT
On 5/27/05, Brian K. Wallace <> wrote:

> | Security-wise it is also a nightmare. There is so much stuff running  in
> | the container that I have no idea of. I usually bind the instance  to
> | localhost and do port translation for those TCP/IP services that  need
> | to be exposed, but even then there are still many ways to  connect to it
> | from localhost that could potentially expose  information or give
> | control to unauthorized people.
> |
> |  S.
> |
> Exactly. And seeing another huge "everything to everyone" server is why
> I never got motivated to do more than observe Geronimo. I'd be better
> served keeping up on what I have to do to keep my existing 'monolith' as
> secure as possible. If it can be broken down, re-arranged, reassembled -
> and still "just work", it would be THE server to use - not just
> "another" server.

I think that this discussion thread now has two distinctly different topics: 

a) Geronimo SVN repo restructuring 
b) Geronimo modules packaging for user consumption 

Can we please split this discussion and keep each one on topic? 

perl -e 'print unpack("u30","D0G)U8V4\@4VYY9&5R\"F)R=6-E+G-N>61E<D\!G;6%I;\"YC;VT*"

The Castor Project

Apache Geronimo

View raw message