geronimo-dev mailing list archives

Site index · List index
Message view « Date » · « Thread »
Top « Date » · « Thread »
From "Geir Magnusson Jr." <ge...@apache.org>
Subject Re: Geronimo subprojects?
Date Mon, 30 May 2005 18:41:21 GMT

On May 29, 2005, at 2:08 AM, Bruce Snyder wrote:

> On 5/28/05, Dain Sundstrom <dain@iq80.com> wrote:
>
>
>> Each subproject has an inherent amount of overhead.  For example,
>> each subproject needs a separate project management committee, each
>> one will need to produce releases (not an easy task) and so on.  I
>> would sat that "there is a demonstrated desire" when we have enough
>> people showing up to handle the overhead and work on the code.  I
>> personally would say one person is not enough, and seven is more then
>> enough.
>>
>
> I don't think that every subproject needs it's own PMC unless it's a
> subproject wholly separate from the existing Geronimo modules. For
> example, if the Spring kernel were brought in as a subproject, it
> would need its own PMC, but I don't think splitting up the existing
> modules and forming individual PMCs is necessary.

Right.  I don't think we need sub-projects or want sub-projects.  I  
think we just need to modularize better and be able to have a stable  
J2EE assembly tree to help the push towards a certified 1.0 Geronimo  
release.

geir

>
> Bruce
> -- 
> perl -e 'print unpack("u30","D0G)U8V4\@4VYY9&5R\"F)R=6-E+G-N>61E<D\! 
> G;6%I;\"YC;VT*"
> );'
>
> The Castor Project
> http://www.castor.org/
>
> Apache Geronimo
> http://geronimo.apache.org/
>
>

-- 
Geir Magnusson Jr                                  +1-203-665-6437
geirm@apache.org



Mime
View raw message