On May 27, 2005, at 12:48 PM, Geir Magnusson Jr. wrote:
>
> On May 27, 2005, at 12:40 PM, Jeremy Boynes wrote:
>
>
>> Geir Magnusson Jr. wrote:
>>
>>
>>> Clearly, we need something like this to get organized around the
>>> final push for certification and the 1.0 release, by why not
>>> just branch for the stable, and head is unstable?
>>>
>>>
>>
>> The names are just suggestions - "trunk", "head", "unstable",
>> whatever.
>>
>> The important thing is that you can easily checkout and build each
>> tree on its own so we can't have both stable and unstable branches
>> of modules (e.g. transaction) under trunk.
>>
>>
>
> right - this is SVN, so the standard branching model actually
> doesn't work. We'll need the branches outside of /trunk anyway
>
> so we have /trunk and /branches/stable and /branches/unstable, the
> former for release work, and the latter for really nutty stuff that
> people want to work on, and head is where mainline development
> continues?
>
(What I'm saying is that I agree with you... we have no real choice
because of how SVN does branches. We clearly need to separate stable
from unstable ongoing work)
geir
> geir
>
>
> --
> Geir Magnusson Jr +1-203-665-6437
> geirm@apache.org
>
>
>
--
Geir Magnusson Jr +1-203-665-6437
geirm@apache.org
|