geronimo-dev mailing list archives

Site index · List index
Message view « Date » · « Thread »
Top « Date » · « Thread »
From "Brian K. Wallace" <>
Subject Re: Stable/Unstable/Sandbox
Date Wed, 01 Jun 2005 00:14:52 GMT
Hash: SHA1

David Jencks wrote:
| I don't know about fair, but I am finding this discussion nearly as
| distracting as the previous one that we put on hold.  I still don't see
| what exotic svn tricks might buy us over normal svn usage, and don't
| want to spend a lot of time thinking about it until we pass all the
| tests.  I still think everyones perspective may change once we are
| passing all the tests and have fixed the few egregious architectural
| problems that crept in.
| I would like to put this discussion on hold until we pass all the tests
| thanks
| david jencks

Agreed. I'm still in favor of 'modification of structure' in the
interests of ease of localized maintenance and possible
deployment/deliverable options not currently available, but I'd much
rather put that on a "TODO" list for after certification than take more
time now to discuss it. Very difficult to advocate "certification first"
and "restructure thoughts now" when those involved in the certification
process would undoubtedly need to be in on the restructure thoughts process.

First things first.

My .02

Version: GnuPG v1.2.5 (MingW32)


View raw message