geronimo-dev mailing list archives

Site index · List index
Message view « Date » · « Thread »
Top « Date » · « Thread »
From Jeff Genender <jgenen...@apache.org>
Subject Re: Module restructure
Date Sat, 28 May 2005 15:25:25 GMT
Actually, SVN's repo for geronimo could have been set up in a modular 
approach instead of a monolithic trunk, and act similarly to CVS.

Alan D. Cabrera wrote:
> 
> 
> Geir Magnusson Jr. wrote, On 5/28/2005 7:10 AM:
> 
>>
>> On May 27, 2005, at 7:46 PM, Alan D. Cabrera wrote:
>>
>>> Jeremy Boynes wrote, On 5/27/2005 7:38 PM:
>>>
>>>
>>>> Alan D. Cabrera wrote:
>>>>
>>>>> Jeremy Boynes wrote, On 5/27/2005 7:26 PM:
>>>>>
>>>>>> David Blevins wrote:
>>>>>>
>>>>>> This one
>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>  ../repos/asf/geronimo/unstable/modules/transaction
>>>>>>>  ../repos/asf/geronimo/stable/modules/transaction
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>
>>>>> Why would we have two versions of transaction?
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>
>>>> I actually think there are going to be additional ones but was  
>>>> keeping it simple to indicate that "stable" came higher up than  
>>>> "transaction". Ultimately we might end up with (hypothetically)
>>>>
>>>> .../geronimo/stable/1.0/modules/transaction
>>>> .../geronimo/stable/1.2/modules/transaction
>>>> .../geronimo/stable/2.0/modules/transaction
>>>> .../geronimo/unstable/1.3/modules/transaction
>>>> .../geronimo/unstable/2.1/modules/transaction
>>>>
>>>> Where, for example, 1.x is J2EE1.4 requiring JDK1.4 and 2.x is  
>>>> J2EE1.5 requiring JDK1.5.
>>>>
>>>
>>> I don't particularly care for odd/even designations for stable/ 
>>> unstable.  Maybe that was a coincidence in your example.  We can  
>>> easily support your scenario and keep w/ standard SVN usage by doing:
>>>
>>> geronimo/transaction/branches
>>> geronimo/transaction/tags/1_0
>>> geronimo/transaction/tags/1_2
>>> geronimo/transaction/tags/1_3
>>> geronimo/transaction/tags/2_0
>>> geronimo/transaction/tags/2_3
>>> geronimo/transaction/trunk
>>
>>
>>
>> The problem here is when you do a co of geronimo/ to get all the  
>> modules, you get a major hose of bits... everything that was ever done.
>>
>> I hate to say it (and Fitz will prollie flog me with a trout...) but  
>> I can now identify one feature of CVS that I miss...
> 
> 
> Boy, I'm glad you said that.  I gotta say, I kinda miss CVS.
> 
> 
> Regards,
> Alan
> 
> 

-- 
Jeff Genender
http://geronimo.apache.org


Mime
View raw message