geronimo-dev mailing list archives

Site index · List index
Message view « Date » · « Thread »
Top « Date » · « Thread »
From "Alan D. Cabrera" <...@toolazydogs.com>
Subject Re: Module restructure
Date Sat, 28 May 2005 00:03:21 GMT


David Blevins wrote, On 5/27/2005 7:51 PM:

>On Fri, May 27, 2005 at 04:38:45PM -0700, Jeremy Boynes wrote:
>  
>
>>Alan D. Cabrera wrote:
>>    
>>
>>>Jeremy Boynes wrote, On 5/27/2005 7:26 PM:
>>>
>>>      
>>>
>>>>David Blevins wrote:
>>>>
>>>>This one
>>>>
>>>>        
>>>>
>>>>>../repos/asf/geronimo/unstable/modules/transaction
>>>>>../repos/asf/geronimo/stable/modules/transaction
>>>>>
>>>>>          
>>>>>
>>>Why would we have two versions of transaction?
>>>
>>>      
>>>
>>I actually think there are going to be additional ones but was keeping 
>>it simple to indicate that "stable" came higher up than "transaction". 
>>Ultimately we might end up with (hypothetically)
>>
>>.../geronimo/stable/1.0/modules/transaction
>>.../geronimo/stable/1.2/modules/transaction
>>.../geronimo/stable/2.0/modules/transaction
>>.../geronimo/unstable/1.3/modules/transaction
>>.../geronimo/unstable/2.1/modules/transaction
>>
>>    
>>
>
>Oh, I get it.  You're just proposing to add the linux kernel odd/even spin on what we
have now and dump trunk.
>  
>
Anyone know the lore as to why they went odd even?  Was it the case that 
the tool that they were using drove them to such an odd nomenclature?


Regards,
Alan






Mime
View raw message