geronimo-dev mailing list archives

Site index · List index
Message view « Date » · « Thread »
Top « Date » · « Thread »
From "Alan D. Cabrera" <...@toolazydogs.com>
Subject Re: Module restructure
Date Fri, 27 May 2005 23:46:47 GMT


Jeremy Boynes wrote, On 5/27/2005 7:38 PM:

> Alan D. Cabrera wrote:
>
>> Jeremy Boynes wrote, On 5/27/2005 7:26 PM:
>>
>>> David Blevins wrote:
>>>
>>> This one
>>>
>>>>
>>>>  ../repos/asf/geronimo/unstable/modules/transaction
>>>>  ../repos/asf/geronimo/stable/modules/transaction
>>>>
>> Why would we have two versions of transaction?
>>
>
> I actually think there are going to be additional ones but was keeping 
> it simple to indicate that "stable" came higher up than "transaction". 
> Ultimately we might end up with (hypothetically)
>
> .../geronimo/stable/1.0/modules/transaction
> .../geronimo/stable/1.2/modules/transaction
> .../geronimo/stable/2.0/modules/transaction
> .../geronimo/unstable/1.3/modules/transaction
> .../geronimo/unstable/2.1/modules/transaction
>
> Where, for example, 1.x is J2EE1.4 requiring JDK1.4 and 2.x is J2EE1.5 
> requiring JDK1.5. 

I don't particularly care for odd/even designations for 
stable/unstable.  Maybe that was a coincidence in your example.  We can 
easily support your scenario and keep w/ standard SVN usage by doing:

geronimo/transaction/branches
geronimo/transaction/tags/1_0
geronimo/transaction/tags/1_2
geronimo/transaction/tags/1_3
geronimo/transaction/tags/2_0
geronimo/transaction/tags/2_3
geronimo/transaction/trunk


Regards,
Alan





Mime
View raw message