geronimo-dev mailing list archives

Site index · List index
Message view « Date » · « Thread »
Top « Date » · « Thread »
From "Geir Magnusson Jr." <ge...@apache.org>
Subject Re: Geronimo subprojects?
Date Mon, 30 May 2005 18:36:42 GMT

On May 28, 2005, at 2:02 PM, Brian K. Wallace wrote:

> -----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
> Hash: SHA1
>
> Dain Sundstrom wrote:
> |
> |> My questions at the root of this are:
> |> ~  1. Assuming the whole of Geronimo passes the TCK, what can  
> be  said of
> |> a 'minimal' Geronimo? Is it able to claim anything with regard  
> to  the
> |> TCK?
> |
> |
> | It depends on the specifications the subproject is implementing  
> and  if
> | Sun has a stand-alone tck for the specifications.  For example,  
> if  it
> | were the Geronimo 'just a webserver edition' we could certify it   
> for
> | servlets and jsp because they have standalone tcks, but if it   
> were tx
> | and jca we could not certify it since there are no standalone   
> tcks for
> | those specs.
> Understood. My main question was if there was some sort of  
> 'prohibition'
> on the use of 'full system' pass/fail statistics for those pieces that
> do, in fact, have their own tcks. [I don't view this as a roadblock to
> anything, but a definite plus if each individual piece that was able
> (due to having and passing their own tcks) could state it passes.]

Yes.  If you want to know if the servlet part works on it's own, you  
need to test it on it's own

geir

-- 
Geir Magnusson Jr                                  +1-203-665-6437
geirm@apache.org



Mime
View raw message