geronimo-dev mailing list archives

Site index · List index
Message view « Date » · « Thread »
Top « Date » · « Thread »
From David Blevins <david.blev...@visi.com>
Subject Re: Module restructure
Date Fri, 27 May 2005 23:51:49 GMT
On Fri, May 27, 2005 at 04:38:45PM -0700, Jeremy Boynes wrote:
> Alan D. Cabrera wrote:
> >
> >
> >Jeremy Boynes wrote, On 5/27/2005 7:26 PM:
> >
> >>David Blevins wrote:
> >>
> >>This one
> >>
> >>>
> >>> ../repos/asf/geronimo/unstable/modules/transaction
> >>> ../repos/asf/geronimo/stable/modules/transaction
> >>>
> >Why would we have two versions of transaction?
> >
> 
> I actually think there are going to be additional ones but was keeping 
> it simple to indicate that "stable" came higher up than "transaction". 
> Ultimately we might end up with (hypothetically)
> 
> .../geronimo/stable/1.0/modules/transaction
> .../geronimo/stable/1.2/modules/transaction
> .../geronimo/stable/2.0/modules/transaction
> .../geronimo/unstable/1.3/modules/transaction
> .../geronimo/unstable/2.1/modules/transaction
> 

Oh, I get it.  You're just proposing to add the linux kernel odd/even spin on what we have
now and dump trunk.

-David

Mime
View raw message