geronimo-dev mailing list archives

Site index · List index
Message view « Date » · « Thread »
Top « Date » · « Thread »
From David Blevins <david.blev...@visi.com>
Subject Re: Geronimo M4
Date Thu, 26 May 2005 19:26:48 GMT
That would be great.  But a lot of our components are inseparable at the moment.  Build-your-own-server
is certainly a goal to shoot for, but we'd need a lot of help getting there.

-David

On Thu, May 26, 2005 at 02:53:16PM -0400, Dmitriy Kopylenko wrote:
> +1 ... with the separate standalone (reusable) distribution units e.g. 
> geronimo-tx.jar, geronimo-jca.jar (the ones I'm interested in) ;-)
> 
> Regards,
> Dmitriy.
> 
> 
> Stefan Arentz wrote:
> 
> >
> >On May 26, 2005, at 5:39 AM, Jeff Genender wrote:
> >
> >>Hi Philippe,
> >>
> >>We are currently working towards an official release, so thanks for  
> >>inquiring.  However, in the mean time, you are welcome to download  
> >>the source and build a latest version for youself.  The source tree  
> >>will contain the closest-to-M4 version and you should be able to  get 
> >>started using Geronimo with the latest and greatest code.
> >
> >
> >Would it make sense to split the release into two and have a  
> >'Geronimo Core (or Kernel)' and 'Geronimo J2EE' part? I would really  
> >like to start doing some more serious work with Geronimo but I have  
> >absolutely no interest in a complete J2EE environment. I'm sure there  
> >are many people in the same situation.
> >
> >It could also make sense from a PR kind of view; right now it looks  
> >like the project is stalled ... it has been a long time since an  
> >official release was made. With a 'Geronimo Core' package that has a  
> >v1.0.x version number that could change. Perception is reality :-)
> >
> > S.
> >

Mime
View raw message