Return-Path: Delivered-To: apmail-geronimo-dev-archive@www.apache.org Received: (qmail 81489 invoked from network); 25 Apr 2005 23:25:54 -0000 Received: from hermes.apache.org (HELO mail.apache.org) (209.237.227.199) by minotaur.apache.org with SMTP; 25 Apr 2005 23:25:54 -0000 Received: (qmail 78510 invoked by uid 500); 25 Apr 2005 23:26:22 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-geronimo-dev-archive@geronimo.apache.org Received: (qmail 78476 invoked by uid 500); 25 Apr 2005 23:26:21 -0000 Mailing-List: contact dev-help@geronimo.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk list-help: list-unsubscribe: List-Post: Reply-To: dev@geronimo.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list dev@geronimo.apache.org Received: (qmail 78462 invoked by uid 99); 25 Apr 2005 23:26:21 -0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=0.0 required=10.0 tests= X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received-SPF: pass (hermes.apache.org: local policy) Received: from smtp103.mail.sc5.yahoo.com (HELO smtp103.mail.sc5.yahoo.com) (66.163.169.222) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.28) with SMTP; Mon, 25 Apr 2005 16:26:21 -0700 Received: from unknown (HELO ?192.168.1.5?) (david?jencks@66.93.38.137 with plain) by smtp103.mail.sc5.yahoo.com with SMTP; 25 Apr 2005 23:25:45 -0000 Mime-Version: 1.0 (Apple Message framework v619.2) In-Reply-To: <426D7846.7040601@savoirtech.com> References: <7b3355cb050419201167618e62@mail.gmail.com> <426D6B47.3060203@savoirtech.com> <426D6FB0.8000100@apache.org> <426D7846.7040601@savoirtech.com> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII; format=flowed Message-Id: Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit From: David Jencks Subject: Re: New Tomcat Changes Date: Mon, 25 Apr 2005 16:25:44 -0700 To: dev@geronimo.apache.org X-Mailer: Apple Mail (2.619.2) X-Virus-Checked: Checked X-Spam-Rating: minotaur.apache.org 1.6.2 0/1000/N On Apr 25, 2005, at 4:07 PM, Jeff Genender wrote: > I am not sure if we are utilizing this for Jetty...I didn't see a > virtual-server style parameter in the geronimo-jetty.xsd. Perhaps it > is somewhere else...which leads me to a discussion we have had in the > past... I think jetty supports virtual hosts but we haven't implemented support for it in the geronimo integration. I can never remember what they are :-( but if you remind me I might be able to suggest how to do it. > > I would very much be interested in taking the geronimo-jetty.xml and > geronimo-tomcat.xml files and merge them as a common version, such as > a geronimo-web.xml...and remove the jetty namespace attributes from > the xsd. This way both containers can surf off the same file....and > reuse the xmlbean code. I did not see anything in the xds that was > container specific. If anything is container specific, the builder > could ignore the parameter. +100. I don't think there is anything jetty specific in the jetty module builder. If you can figure out how to add vhost support that can continue to be the case :-) Were there some JACC requirements about contextID and virtual hosts? thanks david jencks > > Thoughts? > > > Jeremy Boynes wrote: >> Jeff Genender wrote: >>> >>> I also added a Tomcat Builder so we will no longer rely on the Jetty >>> version. The main reason for this is that Tomcat supports virtual >>> hosts (declared by additional HostGBean objects in the plan). The >>> web applications can now include a geronimo-tomcat.xml file in the >>> WEB-INF file which is very similar to the Jetty version. The only >>> difference is support for the parameter. This >>> allows you to deploy your web application to a specific virtual >>> host. >>> >> IIRC Jetty has this function as well - can we merge the vhost changes >> back into the jetty-builder? >> -- >> Jeremy >