geronimo-dev mailing list archives

Site index · List index
Message view « Date » · « Thread »
Top « Date » · « Thread »
From siss...@insession.com
Subject Re: [PROPOSAL] Next milestone release (M4?)
Date Fri, 01 Apr 2005 00:16:11 GMT
toby cabot <toby@caboteria.org> wrote on 01/04/2005 01:12:42 AM:

> Jeremy,
> 
> I agree with the first few bullets.
> 
> On Tue, Mar 29, 2005 at 07:40:13AM -0800, Jeremy Boynes wrote:
> > * verification that the src bundle actually builds and results in the
> >   same binary as we are distibuting
> 
> Is a src bundle is useful to anyone at this stage of the game?  For
> "real" releases, sure, but for now it might make more sense to release
> binaries only and point people at the source code control system if
> they want to build.  The problem with people building from the source
> bundle is that if they try to do anything interesting (like make
> changes to the code) then they're in trouble since they won't have a
> mechanism to stay in sync or submit patches that apply cleanly. I
> think that we've got good enough instructions on the wiki so building
> from svn isn't much more complicated than building from a tarball.
> 
> Regards,
> Toby

Is there a reason why we don't include the svn files in the source tarball 
(we didn't in M3).  Wouldn't that make it easier for people to make 
patches or see a comparison to HEAD to see if a problem they have 
encountered has been fixed?

John

This e-mail message and any attachments may contain confidential, 
proprietary or non-public information.  This information is intended 
solely for the designated recipient(s).  If an addressing or transmission 
error has misdirected this e-mail, please notify the sender immediately 
and destroy this e-mail.  Any review, dissemination, use or reliance upon 
this information by unintended recipients is prohibited.  Any opinions 
expressed in this e-mail are those of the author personally.


Mime
View raw message