geronimo-dev mailing list archives

Site index · List index
Message view « Date » · « Thread »
Top « Date » · « Thread »
From Geir Magnusson Jr <g...@4quarters.com>
Subject Re: [PROPOSAL] Geronimo PMC Managed, project-specific Maven Repository
Date Fri, 01 Apr 2005 00:35:26 GMT

On Mar 31, 2005, at 6:30 PM, Hiram Chirino wrote:

>
> On Mar 31, 2005, at 6:17 PM, Geir Magnusson Jr wrote:
>
>>
>> On Mar 31, 2005, at 6:14 PM, Hiram Chirino wrote:
>>
>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>> I think we should keep as much history as possible, at least the

>>>>>> dependencies for all maintained branches.
>>>>>
>>>>> I would say, we never remove a jar.  A SNAPSHOT jar should just be 
>>>>> a simlink to a numbered jar (this is what maven does already).
>>>>
>>>> Re the snapshots, doesn't that result in piles of useless crap?  I 
>>>> mean, why keep the old numbered jars around?  The build conditions 
>>>> for them are variable at best, and I can't think of situations 
>>>> where you'd need to go and use an old one. ?
>>>>
>>>
>>> It could.  But the main argument to keep old numbered snapshot jars 
>>> is so that you can build an old source release of of geronimo that 
>>> might depend on a old numbered snapshot release.
>>
>> How?  do we ever list the snapshot number in project.xml?
>
> I think for a release, yes..  we should take the effort and specify 
> the snapshot number.

I'm confused, and want to make sure we're not just talking past each 
other accidentally.  For a release, we don't use snapshots anyway, 
right?  We'd generate a set of jars all with the release version number 
in the filename.

geir


-- 
Geir Magnusson Jr                                  +1-203-665-6437
geir@gluecode.com


Mime
View raw message