geronimo-dev mailing list archives

Site index · List index
Message view « Date » · « Thread »
Top « Date » · « Thread »
From David Jencks <>
Subject Re: [PROPOSAL] Next milestone release (M4?)
Date Fri, 01 Apr 2005 00:38:05 GMT

On Mar 31, 2005, at 4:16 PM, wrote:

> toby cabot <> wrote on 01/04/2005 01:12:42 AM:
>> Jeremy,
>> I agree with the first few bullets.
>> On Tue, Mar 29, 2005 at 07:40:13AM -0800, Jeremy Boynes wrote:
>>> * verification that the src bundle actually builds and results in the
>>>   same binary as we are distibuting
>> Is a src bundle is useful to anyone at this stage of the game?  For
>> "real" releases, sure, but for now it might make more sense to release
>> binaries only and point people at the source code control system if
>> they want to build.  The problem with people building from the source
>> bundle is that if they try to do anything interesting (like make
>> changes to the code) then they're in trouble since they won't have a
>> mechanism to stay in sync or submit patches that apply cleanly. I
>> think that we've got good enough instructions on the wiki so building
>> from svn isn't much more complicated than building from a tarball.
>> Regards,
>> Toby
> Is there a reason why we don't include the svn files in the source 
> tarball
> (we didn't in M3).  Wouldn't that make it easier for people to make
> patches or see a comparison to HEAD to see if a problem they have
> encountered has been fixed?

I like the idea, although it would double the size of the jar since 
.svn includes pristine copies of each file.  Maybe we could remove the 
normal working copies and ask people to do svn revert --recursive after 

david jencks

> John
> This e-mail message and any attachments may contain confidential,
> proprietary or non-public information.  This information is intended
> solely for the designated recipient(s).  If an addressing or 
> transmission
> error has misdirected this e-mail, please notify the sender immediately
> and destroy this e-mail.  Any review, dissemination, use or reliance 
> upon
> this information by unintended recipients is prohibited.  Any opinions
> expressed in this e-mail are those of the author personally.

View raw message