Mailing-List: contact dev-help@geronimo.apache.org; run by ezmlm
Precedence: bulk
Reply-To: dev@geronimo.apache.org
Received-SPF: pass (hermes.apache.org: domain of dblevins@visi.com designates
 208.42.156.2 as permitted sender)
Date: Tue, 29 Mar 2005 12:16:12 -0600
From: David Blevins <david.blevins@visi.com>
To: dev@geronimo.apache.org
Subject: Re: [PROPOSAL] Next milestone release (M4?)
Message-ID: <20050329181612.GC21191@isis.visi.com>
References: <56FDD27E-A05C-11D9-9D66-000A95D41A40@apache.org>
 <424976DD.5040109@apache.org>
 <0CA45576-A06D-11D9-9D66-000A95D41A40@apache.org>
 <42498353.2080602@toolazydogs.com>
 <B8F7B5C2-A075-11D9-9D66-000A95D41A40@apache.org>
 <42498D7C.7050508@toolazydogs.com>
 <798FFFBF-A079-11D9-9D66-000A95D41A40@apache.org>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Disposition: inline
In-Reply-To: <798FFFBF-A079-11D9-9D66-000A95D41A40@apache.org>
User-Agent: Mutt/1.3.27i

On Tue, Mar 29, 2005 at 12:39:17PM -0500, Geir Magnusson Jr. wrote:
> 
> On Mar 29, 2005, at 12:16 PM, Alan D. Cabrera wrote:
> 
> >
> >
> >Geir Magnusson Jr. wrote:
> >>
> >>Heh.  I was just thinking about that, and also about the subject of 
> >>OpenEJB - would there be good benefit into bringing it to Geronimo?  
> >>We seem to be so interdependent...
> >
> >
> >Well, hopefully that will change.  I would be very much opposed to 
> >including OpenEJB into Geronimo.
> >
> 
> Can I ask why?  I'm just curious since we seem so interdependent on one 
> another.  I'm not a part of OpenEJB, so I don't know who else is using 
> it, what part of the committer base is independent of Geronimo, stuff 
> like that.

Just making a note here as well.  Those people can be contacted at user@openejb.org.  Only fair we include them in this kind of talk.

-David