Mailing-List: contact dev-help@geronimo.apache.org; run by ezmlm
Precedence: bulk
Reply-To: dev@geronimo.apache.org
Message-ID: <1090728438.1112051072070.JavaMail.jira@ajax.apache.org>
Date: Tue, 29 Mar 2005 01:04:32 +0200 (CEST)
From: "Dain Sundstrom (JIRA)" <dev@geronimo.apache.org>
To: dev@geronimo.apache.org
Subject: [jira] Created: (GERONIMO-620) ServiceAccessController does not
 support ip6address
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit

ServiceAccessController does not support ip6address
---------------------------------------------------

         Key: GERONIMO-620
         URL: http://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/GERONIMO-620
     Project: Geronimo
        Type: Bug
  Components: OpenEJB  
    Reporter: Dain Sundstrom
 Assigned to: Gianny DAMOUR 


The ServiceAccessController class does not work with ip6 addresses.  I have added an if statement that skips ip6 addresses.

Also I think we should use the standard ip bit mask filtering rule style for the masks that xinetd uses.  I found a ok description of the style here http://www.hn.edu.cn/book/NetWork/NetworkingBookshelf_2ndEd/tcp/ch12_05.htm (look near the bottom of this page) but I bet there are better ones out there.

172.16.12.5 defines a specific host

129.6.0.0 defines all hosts with an address that begins with 129.6

0.0.0.0 matches all addresses

172.16.12.{3,6,8,23} defines four different hosts: 172.16.12.3, 172.16.12.6, 172.16.12.8, and 172.16.12.23

172.16.12.128/25 match every address from 172.16.12.128 to 172.16.12.255

I also think you can do the following which is an address and a mask:

172.16.12.0/255.255.224.0

-- 
This message is automatically generated by JIRA.
-
If you think it was sent incorrectly contact one of the administrators:
   http://issues.apache.org/jira/secure/Administrators.jspa
-
If you want more information on JIRA, or have a bug to report see:
   http://www.atlassian.com/software/jira