geronimo-dev mailing list archives

Site index · List index
Message view « Date » · « Thread »
Top « Date » · « Thread »
From Dain Sundstrom <>
Subject Re: Dedicated maven repo
Date Wed, 30 Mar 2005 22:09:59 GMT
On Mar 30, 2005, at 3:37 AM, Geir Magnusson Jr. wrote:

> On Mar 30, 2005, at 5:57 AM, Dirk-Willem van Gulik wrote:
> All - For now, we could make a first step by just putting the geronimo 
> build artifacts on - namely the spec jars 
> (for now, more on that laster), the geronimo-* jars from modules.  If 
> we make publishing snapshot jars the custom whenever a change is 
> committed (manually via maven deploy now, auto later), we can probably 
> go a long way towards reducing some of the build misery that we go 
> through.

We've had this forever

> I'm +1, and happy to limit the ASF-hosted repo to our build artifacts 
> to get started, and use the external proposed repo at Gluecode as a 
> replacement for ibiblio as our primary source for external 
> dependencies, because iBiblio is so slow and painful at times.

I don't think we should move our repo just because someone believes 
there might possibly be a policy against it at Apache.  This simply too 
common of an excuse here.  I think that if you really believe there is 
a policy against it, then we should ask the board for an official 
ruling on it.  We should also insist that any policy is universally 
enforced as there are tons of projects that have all their dependencies 
in cvs or an Apache hosted repo.  My guess there is no policy against 
this (or someone has a lot of enforcement in front of them ;)

My order preference is,, or ibiblio.


View raw message