Return-Path: Delivered-To: apmail-geronimo-dev-archive@www.apache.org Received: (qmail 60067 invoked from network); 16 Feb 2005 11:24:54 -0000 Received: from hermes.apache.org (HELO mail.apache.org) (209.237.227.199) by minotaur-2.apache.org with SMTP; 16 Feb 2005 11:24:54 -0000 Received: (qmail 47265 invoked by uid 500); 16 Feb 2005 11:24:48 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-geronimo-dev-archive@geronimo.apache.org Received: (qmail 47150 invoked by uid 500); 16 Feb 2005 11:24:47 -0000 Mailing-List: contact dev-help@geronimo.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk list-help: list-unsubscribe: list-post: Reply-To: dev@geronimo.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list dev@geronimo.apache.org Received: (qmail 47085 invoked by uid 99); 16 Feb 2005 11:24:47 -0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=0.4 required=10.0 tests=DNS_FROM_RFC_ABUSE X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received-SPF: pass (hermes.apache.org: local policy) Received: from web20626.mail.yahoo.com (HELO web20626.mail.yahoo.com) (216.136.227.90) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.28) with SMTP; Wed, 16 Feb 2005 03:24:46 -0800 Received: (qmail 44898 invoked by uid 60001); 16 Feb 2005 11:24:44 -0000 Comment: DomainKeys? See http://antispam.yahoo.com/domainkeys DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; q=dns; c=nofws; s=s1024; d=yahoo.com; b=eOKvORmjb8pFqyRBvuSLbu+v0uW4C5DOrmOyWjiGfkZ7//gue7WHlw1a3vL/RWQjEfo/0TNjj9P9fLAmuy+TJZlIymwNeYtFFFp5UFWQEsamgiM6crIroNNMPWrspzQqH6mwyTi4LtrttUZzcX8wpY9DMdJdsXRCkAlW7x+myaw= ; Message-ID: <20050216112443.44893.qmail@web20626.mail.yahoo.com> Received: from [65.87.175.83] by web20626.mail.yahoo.com via HTTP; Wed, 16 Feb 2005 03:24:43 PST Date: Wed, 16 Feb 2005 03:24:43 -0800 (PST) From: anita kulshreshtha Subject: Re: A Tomcat deployment question To: dev@geronimo.apache.org, jgenender@apache.org In-Reply-To: <420D120F.6050303@apache.org> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii X-Virus-Checked: Checked X-Spam-Rating: minotaur-2.apache.org 1.6.2 0/1000/N --- Jeff Genender wrote: > > > anita kulshreshtha wrote: > > --- Jeff Genender wrote: > > > > > >> > >>anita kulshreshtha wrote: > >> > >>> > the jetty like webapp classloader would not work. > > > In the later case we will need to provide > common, > > shared dirs in catalina_home (var/catalina). In > this > > case we will need to get access to tomcat's > > classloader. > > This is doable, and as we get developing the Tomcat > builder, we will get > access to the Tomcat class loader. We have no > choice but to obtain the > Tomcat class loader for creating the component > context. > > We also need to think about the meaning > > of autodeploy/redeploy. If people are using tomcat > > because they are familiar with it, then we must > > support this. However here will be limit to this, > for > > example they cannot(?) use tomcat's security. > > We should be able to use Tomcat's security. Its > just a matter of > declaring the proper realm. The realm model > supports pluggable security > components, so this should work fine. > > > Please comment > > TIA > > Anita > > > > > >>2) The concept of a server.xml file needs to be > >>supported for the Tomcat > >>container. In order to allow people to run thier > >>web apps, we must > >>support custom Valves and Realms at the container, > >>host, and context > >>levels. This is normally declared in a server.xml > >>file, however, we > >>could allow for this type of declaration to be > >>implemented in the plans > >>somehow. We need to kick around the appropriate > >>place for this. In any > >>case, this would eventually be a required add-on > to > >>the TMB. > >> > >>3) It would be nice to have the servlets be > >>GBeanized, like Jetty. > >>Although this is not a requirement to get Tomcat > >>integrated, it would be > >>a nice-to-have for consistency sake. > >> > === message truncated === __________________________________ Do you Yahoo!? Yahoo! Mail - You care about security. So do we. http://promotions.yahoo.com/new_mail