geronimo-dev mailing list archives

Site index · List index
Message view « Date » · « Thread »
Top « Date » · « Thread »
From David Jencks <david_jen...@yahoo.com>
Subject Re: WARNING!! re: Request for backward-incompatible gbean plan change (related to GERONIMO-450)
Date Mon, 07 Feb 2005 18:04:31 GMT

On Feb 7, 2005, at 9:40 AM, Dain Sundstrom wrote:

> On Feb 6, 2005, at 11:16 PM, David Jencks wrote:
>
>> Well, I need to think about all this some more to completely 
>> understand it, and I don't think we'll be implementing more generic 
>> naming strategies for a couple of weeks anyway.
>>
>> For now, I propose:
>>
>> 1. replace the two "hardcoded" fields on Configuration with a map
>
> Maybe I skimmed to fast, but what "hardcoded" fields?

     private final String domain;
     private final String server;

>
>> 2. go forward with my original proposal in this thread of changing 
>> namePart to name and name to gbeanName in the xml gbean descriptor.  
>> (was to objectName, so its not entirely my original proposal).
>
> +1
>
>> I think that will get the "xml interface" looking better and remove 
>> the inroads of jsr-77 on the kernel.
>
> What inroads?

primarily those two fields

david jencks

>
>
> On Feb 6, 2005, at 10:05 PM, Jeremy Boynes wrote:
>
>> David Jencks wrote:
>>> Do you think that the "domain" part should be forced to be the kernel
>>> name?
>>
>> No. IIRC JSR77 has rules here for the J2EEDomain object but that is 
>> just a J2EE artifact and there's no reason to constrain this in the 
>> general case.
>
> The kernel name is always the domain name.  It has been that way for a 
> while now.
>
> -dain
>


Mime
View raw message