geronimo-dev mailing list archives

Site index · List index
Message view « Date » · « Thread »
Top « Date » · « Thread »
From David Jencks <david_jen...@yahoo.com>
Subject WARNING!! re: Request for backward-incompatible gbean plan change (related to GERONIMO-450)
Date Sun, 06 Feb 2005 00:31:14 GMT
I think there was no response to this, so unless someone speaks up  
really soon I'm going to implement the change.  IMO the sooner its  
changed the less confusion it will cause.

BE WARNED!

thanks
david jencks

On Jan 10, 2005, at 11:17 AM, David Jencks wrote:

> I recently committed a partial implementation of GERONIMO-450,  
> simplifying the specification of a gbean name in a plan, and making  
> gbean names similar to jsr-77 names.
>
> Currently the syntax is like this:
>
> <gbean namePart="SomeName" type="JCAWorkManager" class="...
>
> or
>
> <gbean  
> name="geronimo.server: 
> J2EEServer=geronimo,J2EEApplication=null,J2EEModule=org/apache/ 
> geronimo/Server,j2eeType=JCAWorkManager,name=SomeName" class="....
>
> I would like to change this to the more straightforward:
>
> <gbean name="SomeName" type="JCAWorkManager" class="...
>
> or
>
> <gbean  
> objectname="geronimo.server: 
> J2EEServer=geronimo,J2EEApplication=null,J2EEModule=org/apache/ 
> geronimo/Server,j2eeType=JCAWorkManager,name=SomeName" class="....
>
>
> Please comment on whether you think this is a good idea and when it  
> should be committed.  Do we need a vote?
>
> Many thanks,
> david jencks
>


Mime
View raw message