geronimo-dev mailing list archives

Site index · List index
Message view « Date » · « Thread »
Top « Date » · « Thread »
From Jeremy Boynes <>
Subject Re: WARNING!! re: Request for backward-incompatible gbean plan change (related to GERONIMO-450)
Date Sun, 06 Feb 2005 17:41:22 GMT
David Jencks wrote:
> I think there was no response to this, so unless someone speaks up  
> really soon I'm going to implement the change.  IMO the sooner its  
> changed the less confusion it will cause.

Lost it in the noise - sorry.

I find the construction stuff confusing, mostly due to unfamiliarity - 
is there doco somewhere on what the new syntax is and what you can set 
when building the name?

I would suggest supporting "gbeanname" as an alias for objectname - 
objectname makes sense for a JMX based kernel but back in Nov(?) we were 
discussing moving away from JMX artifacts.

Finally, is it worth adding a hybrid mode where we mix in the JSR77 
parts but otherwise allow the user to specify the rest, something like

<gbean appname="name=SomeName,type=SomeType" ...


View raw message