geronimo-dev mailing list archives

Site index · List index
Message view « Date » · « Thread »
Top « Date » · « Thread »
From Geir Magnusson Jr <g...@4quarters.com>
Subject Re: GBeanName [was: svn commit: r154723...]
Date Wed, 23 Feb 2005 18:59:41 GMT

On Feb 23, 2005, at 10:14 AM, Dain Sundstrom wrote:

> On Feb 23, 2005, at 9:24 AM, Geir Magnusson Jr wrote:
>
>>
>> On Feb 23, 2005, at 12:23 AM, David Jencks wrote:
>>
>>> +1 on canonical name as internal string representation
>>> -1 on attempting to preserve whatever string is used to construct 
>>> the gbean name
>>
>> I've been following from the peanut gallery, and like deployment, 
>> this seems to be a required topic for participation, so I need to ask 
>> :
>>
>> Why not preserve the string?  it has no intrinsic meaning, does it?   
>> And thus, why not let it be preserved as a convenience for the user?
>>
>> That way, JSR77 name retain their conventional structure, for 
>> example...
>
> You're assuming that we build JSR77 names in a canonical format, and 
> we don't.  It is the job of the console to format a name into 
> something readable by a user.  IMO this is a tree and not a list of 
> 200 character names.

But I don't assume that geronimo is only used for things where JSR77 is 
relevant...

I think it's really important that we remember how useful the Geronimo 
container is w/o J2EE...

geir

>
> -dain
>
>
-- 
Geir Magnusson Jr                                  +1-203-665-6437
geir@gluecode.com


Mime
View raw message