Return-Path: Delivered-To: apmail-geronimo-dev-archive@www.apache.org Received: (qmail 66673 invoked from network); 3 Jan 2005 22:14:11 -0000 Received: from hermes.apache.org (HELO mail.apache.org) (209.237.227.199) by minotaur-2.apache.org with SMTP; 3 Jan 2005 22:14:11 -0000 Received: (qmail 97911 invoked by uid 500); 3 Jan 2005 22:14:03 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-geronimo-dev-archive@geronimo.apache.org Received: (qmail 97860 invoked by uid 500); 3 Jan 2005 22:14:02 -0000 Mailing-List: contact dev-help@geronimo.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk list-help: list-unsubscribe: list-post: Reply-To: dev@geronimo.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list dev@geronimo.apache.org Received: (qmail 97845 invoked by uid 99); 3 Jan 2005 22:14:02 -0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=0.0 required=10.0 tests= X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received-SPF: pass (hermes.apache.org: local policy) Received: from Unknown (HELO mgd.gluecode.com) (64.14.202.141) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.28) with ESMTP; Mon, 03 Jan 2005 14:13:59 -0800 Received: from [192.168.17.100] ([192.168.17.100]) (authenticated bits=0) by mgd.gluecode.com (8.12.10/8.12.10) with ESMTP id j03MDWCW016106 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=RC4-SHA bits=128 verify=NO) for ; Mon, 3 Jan 2005 14:13:33 -0800 Mime-Version: 1.0 (Apple Message framework v619) In-Reply-To: References: Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII; delsp=yes; format=flowed Message-Id: Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit From: Dain Sundstrom Subject: Re: more jsr-77 like gbean names -- GERONIMO-450 Date: Mon, 3 Jan 2005 14:14:07 -0800 To: dev@geronimo.apache.org X-Mailer: Apple Mail (2.619) X-Virus-Checked: Checked X-Spam-Rating: minotaur-2.apache.org 1.6.2 0/1000/N Which classes did you change and is this mostly an additive feature? -dain -- Dain Sundstrom Chief Architect Gluecode Software 310.536.8355, ext. 26 On Jan 3, 2005, at 1:53 PM, David Jencks wrote: > On the plane yesterday I started working on this stuff and think I'm > close to having some parts working. I'm wondering if I should commit > them or wait for a more complete implementation. > > In the interests of not completely breaking backwards compatibility I > currently have stuff like this: > > > or > > class="org.apache.geronimo.connector.deployment.ConnectorModuleBuilder" > > > > resulting in an object name of > > geronimo.server:J2EEApplication=null,J2EEModule=org/apache/geronimo/ > J2EEDeployer,J2EEServer=geronimo,j2eeType=ModuleBuilder,name=ConnectorB > uilder > > As you can see, the names get longer but somewhat more systematic. > > My guess is that I can get this much to work soon, but won't have time > to implement the other parts for a while. > > Opinions? Votes? > > thanks > david jencks