Return-Path: Delivered-To: apmail-geronimo-dev-archive@www.apache.org Received: (qmail 32510 invoked from network); 29 Jan 2005 22:37:48 -0000 Received: from hermes.apache.org (HELO mail.apache.org) (209.237.227.199) by minotaur-2.apache.org with SMTP; 29 Jan 2005 22:37:48 -0000 Received: (qmail 13004 invoked by uid 500); 29 Jan 2005 22:37:45 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-geronimo-dev-archive@geronimo.apache.org Received: (qmail 12925 invoked by uid 500); 29 Jan 2005 22:37:45 -0000 Mailing-List: contact dev-help@geronimo.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk list-help: list-unsubscribe: list-post: Reply-To: dev@geronimo.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list dev@geronimo.apache.org Received: (qmail 12911 invoked by uid 99); 29 Jan 2005 22:37:44 -0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=0.0 required=10.0 tests= X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received-SPF: pass (hermes.apache.org: local policy) Received: from Unknown (HELO mgd.gluecode.com) (64.14.202.141) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.28) with ESMTP; Sat, 29 Jan 2005 14:37:44 -0800 Received: from [192.168.1.5] (dsl093-038-137.pdx1.dsl.speakeasy.net [66.93.38.137]) (authenticated bits=0) by mgd.gluecode.com (8.12.10/8.12.10) with ESMTP id j0TMb5CW028602 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=RC4-SHA bits=128 verify=NO) for ; Sat, 29 Jan 2005 14:37:06 -0800 Mime-Version: 1.0 (Apple Message framework v619) In-Reply-To: <41FC0D28.8060702@apache.org> References: <7CD24ECA-6FE6-11D9-A4A9-000D93361CAA@gluecode.com> <41F81913.30603@apache.org> <41FC0D28.8060702@apache.org> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII; format=flowed Message-Id: <635DF620-7246-11D9-A4A9-000D93361CAA@gluecode.com> Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit From: David Jencks Subject: Re: Is this really the correct svn certificate? Date: Sat, 29 Jan 2005 14:37:42 -0800 To: dev@geronimo.apache.org X-Mailer: Apple Mail (2.619) X-Virus-Checked: Checked X-Spam-Rating: minotaur-2.apache.org 1.6.2 0/1000/N I was given a choice of rejecting, accepting temporarily, or accepting permanently. Before Jeremy's reassurance I accepted temporarily, but have now accepted permanently thanks david jencks On Jan 29, 2005, at 2:24 PM, Jacek Laskowski wrote: > Jeremy Boynes wrote: >> David Jencks wrote: >>> I am now getting a non-expired certificate: >>> >>> Error validating server certificate for 'https://svn.apache.org:443': >>> - The certificate is not issued by a trusted authority. Use the >>> fingerprint to validate the certificate manually! >>> Certificate information: >>> - Hostname: svn.apache.org >>> - Valid: from Jan 26 14:18:55 2005 GMT until Jan 26 14:18:55 2007 >>> GMT >>> - Issuer: http://www.starfieldtech.com/repository, Starfield >>> Technologies, Inc., Scottsdale, Arizona, US >>> - Fingerprint: >>> 19:51:6b:9b:03:78:2b:4b:0f:02:77:ed:2a:85:ef:93:ed:b6:ff:95 >>> >>> >>> Is this still apache or has svn been hijacked? >>> >>> thanks >>> david jencks >> I believe so - at least the cert is recognized by both Firefox and IE. >> My guess would be that SVN does not have the appropriate root CA >> (http://www.valicert.com) available. > > I'm getting the error too, and don't have any idea what to do. Having > seen the commits I think it's only me who can't work it out. What are > the steps to get rid of it? > >> Jeremy > > Jacek >