Return-Path: Delivered-To: apmail-geronimo-dev-archive@www.apache.org Received: (qmail 89827 invoked from network); 20 Jan 2005 09:15:08 -0000 Received: from hermes.apache.org (HELO mail.apache.org) (209.237.227.199) by minotaur-2.apache.org with SMTP; 20 Jan 2005 09:15:08 -0000 Received: (qmail 79665 invoked by uid 500); 20 Jan 2005 09:15:01 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-geronimo-dev-archive@geronimo.apache.org Received: (qmail 79595 invoked by uid 500); 20 Jan 2005 09:15:01 -0000 Mailing-List: contact dev-help@geronimo.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk list-help: list-unsubscribe: list-post: Reply-To: dev@geronimo.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list dev@geronimo.apache.org Received: (qmail 79562 invoked by uid 99); 20 Jan 2005 09:15:00 -0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=0.0 required=10.0 tests= X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received-SPF: neutral (hermes.apache.org: local policy) Received: from grerelbul01.net.external.hp.com (HELO grerelbul01.net.external.hp.com) (155.208.255.36) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.28) with ESMTP; Thu, 20 Jan 2005 01:15:00 -0800 Received: from vistula.poland.hp.com (vistula.poland.hp.com [15.188.0.12]) by grerelbul01.net.external.hp.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id EF5B037E92 for ; Thu, 20 Jan 2005 10:15:28 +0100 (CET) Received: from [127.0.0.1] (jlaskowski1.emea.hpqcorp.net [16.55.105.41]) by vistula.poland.hp.com with ESMTP (8.9.3 (PHNE_28760_binary)/8.8.6 SMKit7.02) id KAA02704 for ; Thu, 20 Jan 2005 10:14:55 +0100 (MET) Message-ID: <41EF768E.20009@apache.org> Date: Thu, 20 Jan 2005 10:14:54 +0100 From: Jacek Laskowski Organization: Apache Geronimo (http://geronimo.apache.org) User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows; U; Windows NT 5.1; en-US; rv:1.8a6) Gecko/20050111 X-Accept-Language: pl, en, en-us MIME-Version: 1.0 To: dev@geronimo.apache.org Subject: Re: Specs Question. References: In-Reply-To: Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Virus-Checked: Checked X-Spam-Rating: minotaur-2.apache.org 1.6.2 0/1000/N Mark wrote: > Quick question regarding specs. > > My build just failed due to a missing dependency: > geronimo-spec-javamail-1.3.1-SNAPSHOT.jar. I went into the > geronimo\specs\javamail directory and ran maven which build the missing > jar file. I was under the impression that we didn't have to explicitly > build the specs anymore. Is this correct? > > If needed the command line for the main build was: > > maven -Dmaven.test.skip=true -Dmaven.itest.skip=true clean default There were some changes to JavaMail module and perhaps that's the reason. I don't know how the spec changes are populated to iBiblio.org. I think it's a manual process. Whenever you change the module, you'll have to upload it to iBiblio. > Mark Jacek