geronimo-dev mailing list archives

Site index · List index
Message view « Date » · « Thread »
Top « Date » · « Thread »
From Sandip Ghayal <sgha...@yahoo.com>
Subject Re: [jira] Commented: (GERONIMO-553) Security Timeout Test failures
Date Fri, 28 Jan 2005 04:29:38 GMT
I don't think so. But guess Alan might be able to give
you proper answer.

Cheers,

Sandip
--- Dain Sundstrom <dsundstrom@gluecode.com> wrote:

> Can this test be rewritten using wait/notify or a
> phantom reference?
> 
> -dain
> 
> --
> Dain Sundstrom
> Chief Architect
> Gluecode Software
> 310.536.8355, ext. 26
> 
> On Jan 27, 2005, at 9:24 AM, Sandip Ghayal wrote:
> 
> > Well we are not doing anything much
> >
> > Just sleeping for 3 second and then sleeping for 7
> > seconds.
> >
> > Ok I have experimented with new values.
> >
> > Scan time of 100 ms
> > Timeout value: 2000 ms
> > Sleep 1: 1000 ms
> > Sleep 2: 3000 ms
> >
> > Total test time  6.86 sec
> >
> > I think this should be acceptable.
> >
> > Sorry Alan, don't want any one screaming at you
> :-)
> >
> > Cheers,
> >
> > Sandip
> > --- Jeremy Boynes <jboynes@apache.org> wrote:
> >
> >> I have to ask - what are we doing that means we
> need
> >> to make the
> >> timeouts so long? Is there some intrinsically
> long
> >> running operation
> >> here or are things just inefficient?
> >>
> >> I ask 'cos a 15 second test is going to get Alan
> >> yelled at again :-)
> >>
> >> --
> >> Jeremy
> >>
> >>
> >> Sandip Ghayal wrote:
> >>> Hi Alan,
> >>>
> >>> Increasing timeout scan did not make any
> >> difference.
> >>> It is one second timeout value that is causing
> >> test to
> >>> fail.(though I do agree timeout scan of 50ms
> will
> >> be
> >>> hard on slow computers, which we can increase)
> >>>
> >>> I do feel that timeouts should be in terms of
> >> couple
> >>> of seconds and not just 1 second.
> >>>
> >>> We can surely optimize its value even further,
> but
> >> I
> >>> think 5 second should be good enough for test.
> it
> >>> takes close to 15secs on my machine to run this
> >> test
> >>> (with 5 sec timeout)
> >>>
> >>> Cheers,
> >>>
> >>> Sandip
> >>> --- "Alan Cabrera (JIRA)"
> >> <dev@geronimo.apache.org>
> >>> wrote:
> >>>
> >>>
> >>>>     [
> >>>>
> >>>
> >>>
> >>
> > http://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/GERONIMO-553?
> 
> > page=comments#action_58168
> >>>
> >>>> ]
> >>>>
> >>>> Alan Cabrera commented on GERONIMO-553:
> >>>> ---------------------------------------
> >>>>
> >>>> 50ms timeout scan?  Yikes, that means that
> slower
> >>>> computers will be doing nothing but scanning. 
> Can
> >>>> you revert the parameters for the test back and
> >> set
> >>>> the timeout scan to 100ms and see if it passes?
> >>>>
> >>>>
> >>>>> Security Timeout Test failures
> >>>>> ------------------------------
> >>>>>
> >>>>>         Key: GERONIMO-553
> >>>>>         URL:
> >>>>
> >>>>
> http://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/GERONIMO-553
> >>>>
> >>>>>     Project: Apache Geronimo
> >>>>>        Type: Improvement
> >>>>>  Components: security
> >>>>> Environment: Windows XP
> >>>>>    Reporter: Sandip Ghayal
> >>>>>    Priority: Minor
> >>>>> Attachments: security_Timout_fix.patch,
> >>>>
> >>>> security_Timout_fix.patch
> >>>>
> >>>>> When during Geronimo Build I found the
> Security
> >>>>
> >>>> test failures for Timeout Test.
> >>>>
> >>>>> During investigation what I found was my login
> >>>>
> >>>> context was being dropped during running of the
> >>>> test. When investigating further I found that
> the
> >>>> timeout was set to one second. Where as the
> next
> >>>> request came after 1.2 secs (though the sleep
> in
> >> the
> >>>> test was for 300 ms).
> >>>>
> >>>>> I think that the time out values and machine
> >> speed
> >>>>
> >>>> is too critical for this test to work with such
> >>>> precisions. So I propose to increase the
> timeout
> >>>> value to 10 secs and increase the sleep times
> >> within
> >>>> the test to 3 secs and 17 secs. (just
> multiplied
> >> all
> >>>> times by 10).
> >>>>
> >>>> -- 
> >>>> This message is automatically generated by
> JIRA.
> >>>> -
> >>>> If you think it was sent incorrectly contact
> one
> >> of
> >>>> the administrators:
> >>>>
> >>>>
> >>>
> >>>
> >>
> >
>
http://issues.apache.org/jira/secure/Administrators.jspa
> >>>
> >>>> -
> >>>> If you want more information on JIRA, or have a
> >> bug
> >>>> to report see:
> >>>>   http://www.atlassian.com/software/jira
> >>>>
> >>>>
> >>>
> >>>
> >>>
> >>>
> >>> 		
> >>> __________________________________
> >>> Do you Yahoo!?
> >>> Yahoo! Mail - Easier than ever with enhanced
> >> search. Learn more.
> >>> http://info.mail.yahoo.com/mail_250
> >>
> >>
> >
> >
> >
> > 		
> > __________________________________
> > Do you Yahoo!?
> > Yahoo! Mail - Easier than ever with enhanced
> search. Learn more.
> > http://info.mail.yahoo.com/mail_250
> 
=== message truncated ===



		
__________________________________ 
Do you Yahoo!? 
Yahoo! Mail - 250MB free storage. Do more. Manage less. 
http://info.mail.yahoo.com/mail_250

Mime
View raw message