geronimo-dev mailing list archives

Site index · List index
Message view « Date » · « Thread »
Top « Date » · « Thread »
From Sandip Ghayal <sgha...@yahoo.com>
Subject Re: [jira] Commented: (GERONIMO-553) Security Timeout Test failures
Date Thu, 27 Jan 2005 17:24:41 GMT
Well we are not doing anything much

Just sleeping for 3 second and then sleeping for 7
seconds.

Ok I have experimented with new values.

Scan time of 100 ms
Timeout value: 2000 ms
Sleep 1: 1000 ms
Sleep 2: 3000 ms

Total test time  6.86 sec

I think this should be acceptable.

Sorry Alan, don't want any one screaming at you :-)

Cheers,

Sandip
--- Jeremy Boynes <jboynes@apache.org> wrote:

> I have to ask - what are we doing that means we need
> to make the 
> timeouts so long? Is there some intrinsically long
> running operation 
> here or are things just inefficient?
> 
> I ask 'cos a 15 second test is going to get Alan
> yelled at again :-)
> 
> --
> Jeremy
> 
> 
> Sandip Ghayal wrote:
> > Hi Alan,
> > 
> > Increasing timeout scan did not make any
> difference.
> > It is one second timeout value that is causing
> test to
> > fail.(though I do agree timeout scan of 50ms will
> be
> > hard on slow computers, which we can increase)
> > 
> > I do feel that timeouts should be in terms of
> couple
> > of seconds and not just 1 second. 
> > 
> > We can surely optimize its value even further, but
> I
> > think 5 second should be good enough for test. it
> > takes close to 15secs on my machine to run this
> test
> > (with 5 sec timeout)
> > 
> > Cheers,
> > 
> > Sandip
> > --- "Alan Cabrera (JIRA)"
> <dev@geronimo.apache.org>
> > wrote:
> > 
> > 
> >>     [
> >>
> > 
> >
>
http://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/GERONIMO-553?page=comments#action_58168
> > 
> >>]
> >>     
> >>Alan Cabrera commented on GERONIMO-553:
> >>---------------------------------------
> >>
> >>50ms timeout scan?  Yikes, that means that slower
> >>computers will be doing nothing but scanning.  Can
> >>you revert the parameters for the test back and
> set
> >>the timeout scan to 100ms and see if it passes?
> >>
> >>
> >>>Security Timeout Test failures
> >>>------------------------------
> >>>
> >>>         Key: GERONIMO-553
> >>>         URL:
> >>
> >>http://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/GERONIMO-553
> >>
> >>>     Project: Apache Geronimo
> >>>        Type: Improvement
> >>>  Components: security
> >>> Environment: Windows XP
> >>>    Reporter: Sandip Ghayal
> >>>    Priority: Minor
> >>> Attachments: security_Timout_fix.patch,
> >>
> >>security_Timout_fix.patch
> >>
> >>>When during Geronimo Build I found the Security
> >>
> >>test failures for Timeout Test.
> >>
> >>>During investigation what I found was my login
> >>
> >>context was being dropped during running of the
> >>test. When investigating further I found that the
> >>timeout was set to one second. Where as the next
> >>request came after 1.2 secs (though the sleep in
> the
> >>test was for 300 ms).
> >>
> >>>I think that the time out values and machine
> speed
> >>
> >>is too critical for this test to work with such
> >>precisions. So I propose to increase the timeout
> >>value to 10 secs and increase the sleep times
> within
> >>the test to 3 secs and 17 secs. (just multiplied
> all
> >>times by 10).
> >>
> >>-- 
> >>This message is automatically generated by JIRA.
> >>-
> >>If you think it was sent incorrectly contact one
> of
> >>the administrators:
> >>  
> >>
> > 
> >
>
http://issues.apache.org/jira/secure/Administrators.jspa
> > 
> >>-
> >>If you want more information on JIRA, or have a
> bug
> >>to report see:
> >>   http://www.atlassian.com/software/jira
> >>
> >>
> > 
> > 
> > 
> > 
> > 		
> > __________________________________ 
> > Do you Yahoo!? 
> > Yahoo! Mail - Easier than ever with enhanced
> search. Learn more.
> > http://info.mail.yahoo.com/mail_250
> 
> 



		
__________________________________ 
Do you Yahoo!? 
Yahoo! Mail - Easier than ever with enhanced search. Learn more.
http://info.mail.yahoo.com/mail_250

Mime
View raw message