Return-Path: 
 <dev-return-10656-apmail-geronimo-dev-archive=geronimo.apache.org@geronimo.apache.org>
Delivered-To: apmail-geronimo-dev-archive@www.apache.org
Received: (qmail 26806 invoked from network); 7 Dec 2004 22:08:26 -0000
Received: from hermes.apache.org (HELO mail.apache.org) (209.237.227.199)
  by minotaur-2.apache.org with SMTP; 7 Dec 2004 22:08:26 -0000
Received: (qmail 15019 invoked by uid 500); 7 Dec 2004 22:08:21 -0000
Delivered-To: apmail-geronimo-dev-archive@geronimo.apache.org
Received: (qmail 14913 invoked by uid 500); 7 Dec 2004 22:08:20 -0000
Mailing-List: contact dev-help@geronimo.apache.org; run by ezmlm
Precedence: bulk
list-help: <mailto:dev-help@geronimo.apache.org>
list-unsubscribe: <mailto:dev-unsubscribe@geronimo.apache.org>
list-post: <mailto:dev@geronimo.apache.org>
Reply-To: dev@geronimo.apache.org
Delivered-To: mailing list dev@geronimo.apache.org
Received: (qmail 14899 invoked by uid 99); 7 Dec 2004 22:08:20 -0000
X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=0.0 required=10.0
	tests=
X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org
Received-SPF: pass (hermes.apache.org: local policy)
Received: from Unknown (HELO mgd.gluecode.com) (64.14.202.141)
  by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.28) with ESMTP; Tue, 07 Dec 2004 14:08:19 -0800
Received: from [192.168.17.103] ([192.168.17.103])
	(authenticated bits=0)
	by mgd.gluecode.com (8.12.10/8.12.10) with ESMTP id iB7M85CW028958
	(version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=RC4-SHA bits=128 verify=NO)
	for <dev@geronimo.apache.org>; Tue, 7 Dec 2004 14:08:06 -0800
Mime-Version: 1.0 (Apple Message framework v619)
In-Reply-To: <41B61B36.9000202@apache.org>
References: <Pine.LNX.4.58.0412051310210.19781@saturn.opentools.org>
 <41B47427.4060402@apache.org>
 <Pine.LNX.4.58.0412061019160.3785@saturn.opentools.org>
 <41B478E4.1050009@apache.org>
 <Pine.LNX.4.58.0412061055560.3785@saturn.opentools.org>
 <6205DEE2-47A5-11D9-895C-000D93C5B79C@gluecode.com>
 <41B61B36.9000202@apache.org>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII; format=flowed
Message-Id: <7E112151-489C-11D9-895C-000D93C5B79C@gluecode.com>
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
From: Dain Sundstrom <dsundstrom@gluecode.com>
Subject: Re: Tomcat Module Still Broken
Date: Tue, 7 Dec 2004 14:08:15 -0800
To: dev@geronimo.apache.org
X-Mailer: Apple Mail (2.619)
X-Virus-Checked: Checked
X-Spam-Rating: minotaur-2.apache.org 1.6.2 0/1000/N

On Dec 7, 2004, at 1:05 PM, Jacek Laskowski wrote:

> Dain Sundstrom wrote:
>> Currently there is only one deployer slot available for each module  
>> type of an EAR.  The following snippit from the  shows the EAR 
>> deployer  configuration
>> <gbean  
>> name="geronimo.deployer:role=Builder,type=EAR,config=org/apache/ 
>> geronimo/J2EEDeployer"
>>         class="org.apache.geronimo.j2ee.deployment.EARConfigBuilder">
>>     <reference name="EJBConfigBuilder">some:object=name</reference>
>>     <reference name="WebConfigBuilder">some:object=name</reference>
>>     <reference  
>> name="ConnectorConfigBuilder">some:object=name</reference>
>>     <reference  
>> name="AppClientConfigBuilder">some:object=name</reference>
>> </gbean>
>> I strongly suggest that we only run one servlet engine in Geronimo.   
>> Both Tomcat and Jetty are pretty large, so I think we should have  
>> separate distributions for them.  Of course this would be easier if I 
>>  had moved assembly last weekend.
>
> It means that I can't deploy a module to both containers and run only 
> one, doesn't it? If so, a user has to decide ahead if (s)he wants to 
> run tomcat or jetty, before deployment takes place, right? I've 
> noticed that the order of deployer entries in the j2ee-deployer plan 
> does matter, i.e. when there're two web deployers defined in the plan, 
> the later wins. Is it always true? Do you know about a solution to not 
> force a user to comment or uncomment a gbean configuration for a web 
> builder?

No.

I know that running two web servers seems cool, but would any (sane) 
user actually need (not want) to do this?  I feel that a reasonable 
solution is to have separate distributions for tomcat and jetty.

-dain