Return-Path: Delivered-To: apmail-geronimo-dev-archive@www.apache.org Received: (qmail 10925 invoked from network); 24 Nov 2004 21:37:15 -0000 Received: from hermes.apache.org (HELO mail.apache.org) (209.237.227.199) by minotaur-2.apache.org with SMTP; 24 Nov 2004 21:37:15 -0000 Received: (qmail 73696 invoked by uid 500); 24 Nov 2004 21:37:05 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-geronimo-dev-archive@geronimo.apache.org Received: (qmail 73660 invoked by uid 500); 24 Nov 2004 21:37:05 -0000 Mailing-List: contact dev-help@geronimo.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk list-help: list-unsubscribe: list-post: Reply-To: dev@geronimo.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list dev@geronimo.apache.org Received: (qmail 73645 invoked by uid 99); 24 Nov 2004 21:37:05 -0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=0.0 required=10.0 tests= X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received-SPF: pass (hermes.apache.org: local policy) Received: from Unknown (HELO mgd.gluecode.com) (64.14.202.141) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.28) with ESMTP; Wed, 24 Nov 2004 13:37:04 -0800 Received: from [10.0.1.5] (ca-stmnca-cuda2-blade8b-82.stmnca.adelphia.net [68.65.226.82]) (authenticated bits=0) by mgd.gluecode.com (8.12.10/8.12.10) with ESMTP id iAOLasCW004095 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=RC4-SHA bits=128 verify=NO) for ; Wed, 24 Nov 2004 13:36:55 -0800 Mime-Version: 1.0 (Apple Message framework v619) In-Reply-To: <41A4F500.3030209@gluecode.com> References: <26906998-3E48-11D9-B78A-000D93C5B79C@gluecode.com> <41A4D82D.1060205@gluecode.com> <33B7B138-3E4B-11D9-B78A-000D93C5B79C@gluecode.com> <41A4F500.3030209@gluecode.com> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII; format=flowed Message-Id: Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit From: Dain Sundstrom Subject: Re: GBeans, Kernel and JMX Exceptions Date: Wed, 24 Nov 2004 13:36:58 -0800 To: dev@geronimo.apache.org X-Mailer: Apple Mail (2.619) X-Virus-Checked: Checked X-Spam-Rating: minotaur-2.apache.org 1.6.2 0/1000/N On Nov 24, 2004, at 12:54 PM, Jeremy Boynes wrote: > Dain Sundstrom wrote: >> When you going to make that change? I'm working on the GBean code >> right now, but will be offline Thursday until Sunday Morning. > > I've been waiting to see if there is any more input given this is not > critical and it does change the API. As I said, I plan to get to it > this week. Are you going to finish up your changes before you > disappear? I hope so :) I'm getting close.... >> Also, I'm a bit curious about the GBeanName interface? For example, >> I assume we are keeping the concept of pattern matching, but are we >> keeping the concept that a name contains name/value pairs. I know >> there is some J2EE deployment code manipulate the name/value pairs to >> build new object names. > > Of course - there is a lot of other stuff that relies on this. cool -dain