Mailing-List: contact dev-help@geronimo.apache.org; run by ezmlm
Precedence: bulk
Reply-To: dev@geronimo.apache.org
Received-SPF: pass (hermes.apache.org: local policy)
Mime-Version: 1.0 (Apple Message framework v619)
In-Reply-To: <41607C8C.9060408@hiramchirino.com>
References: <20041003200907.38057.qmail@minotaur.apache.org>
 <79E3BB4D-157B-11D9-B7E9-000D93361CAA@gluecode.com>
 <7A0C3B02-1589-11D9-B927-000D93C5B79C@gluecode.com>
 <41607C8C.9060408@hiramchirino.com>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII; delsp=yes; format=flowed
Message-Id: <2506AADA-15AB-11D9-B927-000D93C5B79C@gluecode.com>
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
From: Dain Sundstrom <dsundstrom@gluecode.com>
Subject: Re: svn commit: rev 51845 - in geronimo/trunk/modules/assembly/src:
 plan var/config
Date: Sun, 3 Oct 2004 19:14:38 -0700
To: dev@geronimo.apache.org

and that is not accessed via a standard JMS API?  We only need the  
classes if user code is expected to interact with the class.

-dain

On Oct 3, 2004, at 3:26 PM, Hiram Chirino wrote:

> For the in vm transport that bypasses tcpip and serialization to send  
> messages, yes.
>
> Regards,
> Hiram
>
> Dain Sundstrom wrote:
>
>> I don't see why we would need ActivMQ in the main class loader   
>> hierarchy.  Users of ActiveMQ should access it via the standard JMS   
>> apis which are available to any child of the J2EE configuration.  The  
>>  only reason to make this part of the main chain would be is if a  
>> child  configuration needed to access the internal classes of  
>> ActiveMQ.  Are  we doing that?
>>
>> -dain
>>
>> --  
>> Dain Sundstrom
>> Chief Architect
>> Gluecode Software
>> 310.536.8355, ext. 26
>>
>> On Oct 3, 2004, at 1:33 PM, David Jencks wrote:
>>
>>> Unless we come up with non-classloader based package dependencies, I  
>>>  think JMS __does__ need to be a child of SystemDatabase or vice  
>>> versa,  so you can be sure, by making one or the other your parent,  
>>> that they  are both started.
>>>
>>> david jencks
>>>
>>> On Oct 3, 2004, at 1:09 PM, jboynes@apache.org wrote:
>>>
>>>> Author: jboynes
>>>> Date: Sun Oct  3 13:09:06 2004
>>>> New Revision: 51845
>>>>
>>>> Modified:
>>>>    geronimo/trunk/modules/assembly/src/plan/system-jms-plan.xml
>>>>    geronimo/trunk/modules/assembly/src/var/config/config.list
>>>> Log:
>>>> JMS does not need to be a child of the SystemDatabase plan; move it  
>>>>  under server and add to initial start list
>>>>
>>>> Modified:  
>>>> geronimo/trunk/modules/assembly/src/plan/system-jms-plan.xml
>>>> ==================================================================== 
>>>> == ========
>>>> ---  geronimo/trunk/modules/assembly/src/plan/system-jms-plan.xml    
>>>>   (original)
>>>> +++ geronimo/trunk/modules/assembly/src/plan/system-jms-plan.xml     
>>>> Sun  Oct  3 13:09:06 2004
>>>> @@ -21,7 +21,7 @@
>>>>  <connector xmlns="http://geronimo.apache.org/xml/ns/j2ee/connector"
>>>>      version="1.5"
>>>>      configId="org/apache/geronimo/SystemJMS"
>>>> -    parentId="org/apache/geronimo/SystemDatabase">
>>>> +    parentId="org/apache/geronimo/Server">
>>>>    <resourceadapter>
>>>>      <resourceadapter-instance>
>>>>        <resourceadapter-name>ActiveMQ RA</resourceadapter-name>
>>>>
>>>> Modified: geronimo/trunk/modules/assembly/src/var/config/config.list
>>>> ==================================================================== 
>>>> == ========
>>>> ---  geronimo/trunk/modules/assembly/src/var/config/config.list     
>>>> (original)
>>>> +++ geronimo/trunk/modules/assembly/src/var/config/config.list     
>>>> Sun  Oct  3 13:09:06 2004
>>>> @@ -1,3 +1,4 @@
>>>>  org/apache/geronimo/System
>>>>  org/apache/geronimo/Server
>>>>  org/apache/geronimo/SystemDatabase
>>>> +org/apache/geronimo/SystemJMS
>>>>
>>